COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80684I99900K
AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
▲ 8214,263 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.6GHz, Coffee Lake.
Release date: Q4 2018.

VS
About
▲ 717,872 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.7GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

Game EFps  
+25%
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max 		298 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+49% 		200 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 		108 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+11% 		97 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 		138 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+7% 		129 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max 		137 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+19% 		115 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 		149 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+38% 		108 EFps
Effective Speed 
+20%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 848,888 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
369,245 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 86% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 86% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 26th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
479,643 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.7 GHz
Worst Bench: 71% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 142nd / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		97.6 % Faster effective speed.
+20% 		81 %
External Data: 1080p 
+22%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review 		14 % FarC5 37%, BFV 18%, Rage2 1%, Witcher3 6%, Civ6 17%, ACO 12%, MetroEx 10%, Sekiro 35%, Wolf2 9% SotTR 1%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review 		15 % FarC5 37%, BFV 18%, Rage2 5%, Witcher3 6%, Civ6 17%, ACO 12%, MetroEx 10%, Sekiro 35%, Wolf2 9% SotTR 1%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ... 		14 % FarC5 37%, BFV 18%, Rage2 1%, Witcher3 6%, Civ6 17%, ACO 12%, MetroEx 10%, Sekiro 35%, Wolf2 9% SotTR 1%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki... 		33 % OC TWarW2 33% OC, F118 29% OC, GTAV 37% OC
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki... 		31 % Hitm2 37%, TWarW2 27%, F118 28%, GTAV 31%, SotTR 34%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review 		20 % Hitm2 27%, FarC5 36%, StrangeB 1%, TWarW2 26%, SotTR 41%, ACO 10%, MetroEx 10%, MESoW 16%, Divis2 10%
07 Jul19|Linustechtips
I had given up on AMD… until today... 		26 % SotTR 29%, BFV 33%, CSGO 37%, MetroEx 21%, R6S 10%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S... 		23 % BFV 26%, SotTR 20%, MetroEx 26%, Divis2 20%
Average Score 
+22%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		92.8 Pts Lower memory latency.
+17% 		79 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 		142 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+22% 		116 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed 		281 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+23% 		228 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed 		549 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+23% 		445 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 		1006 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+25% 		805 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+22%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		97.3 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+10% 		88.2 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed 		153 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+23% 		124 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed 		305 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+24% 		245 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed 		606 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+25% 		485 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed 		1164 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+25% 		934 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+3%
Market Share
Based on 43,972,316 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		1.26 % Higher market share.
+12% 		1.12 %
Value
Value For Money 		90.3 % +3% 87.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		82 % More popular.
+15% 		71 %
Price
Price (score) 		$368 $210 Much cheaper.
+43%
Nice To Haves 
+6%
Age
Newest 		31 Months More recent.
+16% 		37 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		95 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
+10% 		105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		8 cores 8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		16 threads 16 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		14 nm 12 nm Newer manufacturing.
+14%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.6 GHz 3.7 GHz +3%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		5 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+16% 		4.3 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed 		1586 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+17% 		1350 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 		1434 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+16% 		1239 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Coffee Lake Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1151 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		UHD 630 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 97.6%
Average Bench 81%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel i9-9900K is an 8 core, 16 thread, unlocked 9th generation Coffee Lake processor. It has a base / boost clocks of 3.6 / 4.7 GHz and a single-core boost of 5.0 GHz (the highest frequency achieved yet from this class of Intel CPU). It features 16 MB of cache, a 95W TDP and Intel UHD 630 graphics. The 9900K is compatible with the new Z390 chipset, and subject to a BIOS update, is also compatible with the older Z370 chipset. Aimed at users who do not wish to compromise, the i9-9900K offers the best gaming and desktop experience available at any price. Heavy workstation users should consider the Ryzen 9 3900X which is similarly priced. Comparing the overclocked 3900X shows that it is just 10% worse for gaming and desktop (sub octa-core) but around 40% better for 64-core computations. Gamers should consider the 9700K which offers identical overclocked gaming performance at a $100 USD discount. [Oct '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
369,245
479,643
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $300Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback