IntelBX8070811900K
AMDYD1400BBAEBOX

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.5GHz, Rocket Lake.
Release date: Q1 2021.

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.2GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q2 2017.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 73,493 user samples
9,542 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 119% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 96% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 96% Great: 119%
SPEED RANK: 1st / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
63,951 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 51% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 51% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 455th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
109 % Much faster effective speed.
+74%
63 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
87.5 Pts Lower memory latency.
+28%
68.5 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
187 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+106%
90.9 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
371 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+113%
174 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
701 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+126%
310 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
1244 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+153%
491 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
96 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+25%
76.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
198 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+90%
104 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
397 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+98%
200 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
764 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+106%
370 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
1444 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+149%
579 Pts
Market Share
Based on 46,502,907 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.39 % Hugely higher market share.
+255%
0.11 %
Value
Value For Money
91 % Much better value.
+41%
64.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
73 % More popular.
+20%
61 %
Price
Price (score)
$540 $255 Much cheaper.
+53%
Age
Newest
6 Months Hugely more recent.
+89%
53 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+48%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.5 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+9%
3.2 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.3 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+56%
3.4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1849 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+216%
586 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1742 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+248%
501 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Rocket Lake Zen
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1200 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 750 None
ADVERTISEMENT

The i9-11900K is the fastest CPU in Intel’s 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S lineup which brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) and 50% stronger integrated graphics. There are also 500 series chipset improvements including: 20 PCIe4 CPU lanes (up from 16) and USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps up from 10 Gbps). Rocket Lake’s IPC uplift translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 5 1400 is the entry-level chip from AMD's latest Ryzen 5 series which is aimed at the mainstream market. The 1400 is a budget quad core, 8 threaded CPU with base/boost clocks of 3.2/3.4 GHz. Like most the other non-X Ryzen CPUs the 1400 comes with a decent cooler included in the box (Wraith Stealth in this case). Modestly priced at $169 the 1400 is in direct competition with Intel's recent Kaby Lake dual core, four threaded i3-7350k which runs at a base clock of 4.2GHz. The 1400's 8 threads allow a near 40% lead in multi-core processing, but for single-core tasks the 7350K is 45% faster. The Ryzen 5 1500X commands a $20 premium and offers a 25% increase in effective speed over the 1400. Although the 1400 only has a base clock of 3.2 GHz it should more or less match the 1500X when overclocked. Provided it is overclocked, the 1400 joins the other non-X Ryzen models in offering the best bang for your buck. Users not keen on overclocking would probably do better to consider the 1500X at this price point. [Apr '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback