COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX8070110850K
AMDYD180XBCAEWOF
VS
▲ 6616,675 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.6GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q1 2017.

Effective Speed 
+38%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 114,923 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
84,873 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 105% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 88% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 88% Great: 105%
SPEED RANK: 81st / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
30,050 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 82% Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 58% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 58% Great: 82%
SPEED RANK: 362nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		98.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+38% 		71.8 %
External Data: 1080p 
+51%
26 Dec20|Tom's Hardware
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Review: The Pric... 		51 % Hitm2 40%, FarC5 61%, Bord3 34%, ProjC3 75%, SotTR 61%, RDR2 40%, Divis2 44%
Average Score 
+41%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		92 Pts Much lower memory latency.
+31% 		70.2 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		146 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+36% 		107 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		288 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+38% 		208 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		567 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+44% 		394 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1076 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+57% 		686 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+30%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		97.4 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+21% 		80.5 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		155 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+29% 		120 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		307 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+28% 		239 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		609 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+30% 		469 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1193 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+41% 		846 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+373%
Market Share
Based on 67,739,438 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.34 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,600% 		0.02 %
Value
Value For Money 		98.1 % 109 % Better value.
+12%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		56 % 66 % More popular.
+18%
Price
Price (score) 		$286 $60 Much cheaper.
+79%
Nice To Haves 
+61%
Age
Newest 		44+ Months Much more recent.
+48% 		85 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1987 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+61% 		1238 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1845 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+73% 		1065 Pts
Conclusion 
Average Bench 98.9%
Average Bench 71.8%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core i9-10850K is one of the best valued high-end CPUs from Intel in the past few years. Essentially, the 10850K is a worse binned 10900K, meaning that it may be a hundred or two megahertz slower than the 10900K and may not overclock as well as a standard 10900K. Otherwise, the 10850K is nearly identical to the 10900K. The 10850K is a very strong gaming and workstation CPU. With a sub-$400 price-tag, the 10850K has a similar pricing to the Ryzen 7 5800X. Gamers who want the faster overall gaming performance should go with the Ryzen 7 5800X, while users who want the best overclocking and a slightly better workstation/multi-core performance may want to stick with the 10850K. Note that Intel will be switching to a new chipset with their 12th generation Alder Lake processors, so the upgrade path is limited to Intel's 11th generation Rocket Lake processors, which is mostly not worth the upgrade. Also, as of Q1 of 2020, the 10900K remains $75-100 more expensive than the 10850K. There is just not enough performance gain for most users to justify the extra cost, so most users would be better off with a 10850K. At the end of the day, the 10850K is still a very solid choice for anyone who wants a high-performing intel processor that will last for a good few years before really needing a upgrade.  [May '21 NorthStar]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 7 1800X is AMD's flagship Ryzen CPU. Clocked at 3.6 GHz with a turbo frequency of 4.0 GHz (stock) this chip offers a staggering level of multi-core performance. Comparing the 1800X with the Intel i7-6850K shows that the 1800X delivers 25% more multi-core throughput than its more expensive counterpart. Historically AMD's CPU architecture has had a much lower IPC than Intel's and consequently Intel have dominated the CPU market since 2009. Comparing IPC between Intel's Kaby Lake and Ryzen shows a maximum gap of just 9%. A very welcome shake-up of the CPU market will unfold as the remaining Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 3 models are rolled out. For now the 1800X offers workstation users similar processing power to a $1,000 i7-6900K at half the price. [Mar '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
84,873
30,050
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback