COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80601920
AMDFD8350FRHKBOX
▲ 542,506 ▼

4 Cores, 8 Threads @2.66GHz, Nehalem.
Release date: Q3 2008.

VS
▲ 5726,759 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.0GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

Effective Speed 
+1%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 382,270 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
69,074 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 46% Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 46% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 556th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
313,196 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Base clock 4.75 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 568th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		61.6 % +1% 60.8 %
Average Score 
+2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		84.9 Pts +5% 81 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		64.7 Pts +1% 64.3 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		124 Pts +2% 122 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		211 Pts 221 Pts +5%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		298 Pts 341 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+14%
Overclocked Score 
+8%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		94.7 Pts +3% 91.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		84.8 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+16% 		73.3 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		161 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+13% 		143 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		279 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+10% 		254 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		388 Pts 397 Pts +2%
Value & Sentiment 
+26%
Market Share
Based on 67,716,656 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.05 % Much higher market share.
+67% 		0.03 %
Value
Value For Money 		83.9 % Better value.
+12% 		74.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		54 % 57 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
Price
Price (score) 		$90 Much cheaper.
+31% 		$130
Nice To Haves 
+30%
Age
Newest 		187 Months 138 Months More recent.
+26%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		130 Watts 125 Watts +4%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		8 threads 8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		45 nm 32 nm Newer manufacturing.
+29%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		2.66 GHz 4 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+50%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		2.93 GHz 4.2 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+43%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		399 Pts 411 Pts +3%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		306 Pts 353 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+15%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Nehalem Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		LGA1366 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 61.6%
Average Bench 60.8%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core i7-920 is five and a half years old which puts it at an enormous disadvantage to more modern processors. The 920 sports four cores and eight threads which is the same basic configuration that Intel still uses in the majority of their i7s. Comparing the 920 to the 4770K, its modern day equivalent, shows that 920 lags by 63% at stock speeds and by 44% when both processors are overclocked. Overclocking improves the 920 by 30% vs just 17% for the 4770K. Aside from approximately 50% more calculation throughput the 4770K offers lower power consumption, compatibility with Intel's latest FCLGA1150 platform, on-board graphics and newer CPU instructions. Owners of the 920 should probably consider upgrading not only to improve system response times but also to take advantage of the newer platform. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
69,074
313,196
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback