IntelCW8064701470702
Intel

4 Cores, 8 Threads @2.4GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q1 2013.

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.6 GHz, Sandy Bridge E.
Release date ≤ Q4 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 110,326 user samples
70,078 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Base clock 2.4 GHz
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 47% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 402nd / 1337
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
40,248 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 82% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 64% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 64% Great: 82%
SPEED RANK: 284th / 1337
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
66.7 % 73 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
81.5 Pts 85 Pts +4%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
85 Pts 95.2 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+12%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
163 Pts 187 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+15%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
283 Pts 331 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+17%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
425 Pts 498 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+17%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.4 Pts 94.2 Pts +3%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
97.3 Pts 112 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+15%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
189 Pts 220 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+16%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
354 Pts 403 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+14%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
513 Pts 599 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+17%
Market Share
Based on 50,015,585 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.03 % 0.04 % Much higher market share.
+33%
Value
Value For Money
72.2 % Slightly better value.
+5%
68.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
55 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
51 %
Price
Price (score)
$209 Much cheaper.
+40%
$350
Age
Newest
106 Months 97+ Months Slightly more recent.
+8%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
515 Pts 599 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+16%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
428 Pts 504 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+18%
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q2'13 Q1'12
Cache
Cache
6 MB SmartCache 10 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 SSE4.2, AVX, AES
Lithography
Lithography
22 nm 32 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$378.00 N/A
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz 3.8 GHz
Max Memory Size
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type)
32 GB 64 GB
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3L 1333/1600 DDR3 1066/1333/1600
Memory Channels
Max # of Memory Channels
2 4
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
25.6 GB/s 51.2 GB/s
Package Size
Package Size
37.5mm x 32mm x 1.6mm 52.5mm x 45.0mm
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡
No Yes
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
3 2.0
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
16 40

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core i7-4700MQ is a high end mobile Haswell (2013) CPU. Despite sporting base and turbo clock speeds of 2.4/3.4 GHz, the 4700MQ has a maximum TDP of just 47 Watts. Although the 4700MQ is a quad core processor, hyperthreading technology allows the operation of eight virtual cores which enable the 4700MQ to deal with multi-core workloads with ease. The overall effective speed rating for the 4700MQ is 85.5 which is just 12% slower than the average of the current 9 group leaders. Since the group leaders include both desktop and server models this is a particularly impressive score for mobile processor with a TDP of just 47 Watts - it's almost as good as a reasonable desktop. [Oct '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $295Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $184Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $250Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback