IntelBX80637I73770
$297
AMD100-100000281BOX
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 308,525 user samples
278,207 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 57% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 57% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 423rd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
30,318 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 74% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 74% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 184th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
69 % 84.8 % Faster effective speed.
+23%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
83 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7%
77.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
91.3 Pts 140 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+53%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
174 Pts 272 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+56%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
299 Pts 495 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+66%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
436 Pts 821 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+88%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
93.1 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+6%
88.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
101 Pts 150 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+49%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
198 Pts 296 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+49%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
345 Pts 563 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+63%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
497 Pts 905 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+82%
Market Share
Based on 67,720,174 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.42 % Insanely higher market share.
+4,100%
0.01 %
Value
Value For Money
67.7 % 79.1 % Better value.
+17%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
58 % +4% 56 %
Price
Price (score)
$297 Cheaper.
+17%
$359
Age
Newest
145 Months 45+ Months Much more recent.
+69%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
498 Pts 1127 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+126%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
449 Pts 1029 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+129%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core i7-3770 is an Ivy Bridge processor. With four cores and eight threads the 3770 has excellent single , dual and multi-core performance. Comparing the 3770 to the 4770K shows that the 4770K leads by 11% at stock speeds and, thanks to an unlocked multiplier on the 4770K, by 15% at overclocked frequencies. The i7-3770 has a very strong performance profile which includes multi-core capabilities that are likely to be overkill for the majority of desktop users. Comparing the 3770 to the 3770K shows that the unlocked 3770K allows for, on average, an additional 8% increase in performance. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The XT series of Ryzen CPUs barely outperform their cheaper X and non-X counterparts: 3600, 3600X, 3800X, 3900X. Outside of encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU the Ryzen architecture remains limited by relatively high latency and the associated gaming bottleneck (frame drops). Dedicated hardware such as NVENC or QuickSync remains far more efficient than CPU cores for encoding. CPU based encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn. The best value CPU amongst the Ryzen range is the 3300X which is the first design to focus on delivering lower latency, and therefore better performance where users need it, rather than “Moar Coars”. Aside from the army of anonymous influencers on social media (reddit, forums, youtube etc.), users will be hard pressed to find rational arguments that favor the XT variants over their cheaper predecessors. [Jul '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback