IntelBX8070811700K
AMD100-100000059WOF

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.6GHz, Rocket Lake.
Release date: Q1 2021.

16 Cores, 32 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen3.
Release date: Q4 2020.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
306 EFps 318 EFps +4%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
109 EFps +1% 108 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
146 EFps +3% 142 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
147 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+11%
133 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
136 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+12%
121 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 58,723 user samples
21,130 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 116% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 94% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 94% Great: 116%
SPEED RANK: 3rd / 1317
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
37,593 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 87% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 87% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 17th / 1317
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
106 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+7%
99.6 %
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
1 % BFV 8% SotTR 0%, MetroEx 3%, Divis2 2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
87.7 Pts +1% 86.6 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
180 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+14%
158 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
353 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+13%
313 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
669 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+11%
603 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
1179 Pts 1186 Pts +1%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
95.8 Pts +0% 95.6 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
189 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+12%
169 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
378 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+12%
336 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
735 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+13%
651 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
1379 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+8%
1281 Pts
Market Share
Based on 47,280,025 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.72 % Slightly higher market share.
+7%
0.67 %
Value
Value For Money
99.7 % Much better value.
+31%
76.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
96 % Much more popular.
+43%
67 %
Price
Price (score)
$350 Much cheaper.
+53%
$739
Age
Newest
7 Months Much more recent.
+36%
11 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 Watts 105 Watts More energy efficient.
+16%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.6 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+6%
3.4 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5 GHz +2% 4.9 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1793 Pts 3329 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+86%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1679 Pts 2916 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+74%
Series
CPU Architecture
Rocket Lake Zen3
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1200 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 750 None
ADVERTISEMENT

The i7-11700K is the second fastest CPU in Intel’s 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S lineup which brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) and 50% stronger integrated graphics. There are also 500 series chipset improvements including: 20 PCIe4 CPU lanes (up from 16) and USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps up from 10 Gbps). Rocket Lake’s IPC uplift translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Feb '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 16-core, 32-thread Ryzen 9 5950X is an impressive workhorse. It sits at the top of AMD’s latest Zen 3 based, 5000 series of CPUs and sends a clear message that AMD can beat Intel in terms of raw performance and core count. The 5950X has a boost clock speed of up to 4.9 GHz, a massive 72 MB cache and a TDP rating of 105W. Despite the clear “gaming” focus of AMD’s 5000 series launch marketing, the 5950X does not efficiently leverage all its 16 cores in gaming (as demonstrated by similar effective speed scores compared to the 12-core 5900X, 8-core 5800X and 6-core 5600X.) 16 cores are only suitable for professional use cases that have CPU processing needs which cannot be more efficiently met by a GPU or other dedicated hardware. There is no Intel equivalent with this number of cores, and the 5950X’s uniqueness is reflected in its $799 USD price tag, 45% more expensive than the 5900X. Gamers will get far higher FPS per dollar by allocating a higher proportion of their budget towards a better GPU rather than blowing $799 USD on the 5950X. Professional users that plan to use 32 concurrent threads at 100% load will find value in the 5950X. On the other hand, workstation users that rarely exceed 20 concurrent threads at 100% should consider the 10850K for around half the money. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback