IntelBX80684I59400F
AMD100-100000071BOX

6 Cores, 6 Threads @2.9GHz, Coffee Lake.
Release date: Q1 2019.

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.6GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps 233 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
107 EFps +2% 105 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+6%
130 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
123 EFps 124 EFps +1%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
130 EFps 141 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+8%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 934,901 user samples
299,482 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 72% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Poor: 72% Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 186th / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
635,419 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 76% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 76% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 171st / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
84.8 % 85.9 % +1%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
FarC5 8%, StrangeB 1%, MetroEx 2%, MESoW 2% 1 % Hitm2 4%, TWarW2 8%, SotTR 2%, ACO 7%, Divis2 4%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
BFV 7% 12 % SotTR 24%, MetroEx 7%, Divis2 24%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ...
FarC5 7%, Witcher3 2%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 7%, Wolf2 1% 1 % BFV 5%, SotTR 5%, Rage2 6%, Civ6 10%, ACO 9%
21 May20|Optimum Tech
Intel i5-10600K Review - 6-core Ga...
FarC5 7%, RDR2 5%, StarWJFO 8% 4 % OverW 3%, SotTR 7%, CSGO 31%
20 Oct20|Tom's Hardware
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review: Non-X Mar...
10 % Hitm2 7%, FarC5 1%, AotS 38%, WarhDoW3 10%, ProjC2 5%, GTAV 7%, Civ6 15%, FinFant15 5%, WoT 6%, Divis2 3%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
87.8 Pts Lower memory latency.
+15%
76.2 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
117 Pts 138 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+18%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
233 Pts 270 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+16%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
450 Pts 513 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+14%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
589 Pts 900 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+53%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
94.4 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+9%
86.6 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
123 Pts 145 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+18%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
243 Pts 288 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+19%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
484 Pts 562 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+16%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
685 Pts 1009 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+47%
Market Share
Based on 67,708,066 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.2 % Hugely higher market share.
+249%
0.63 %
Value
Value For Money
112 % Better value.
+20%
93.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
86 % 89 % +3%
Price
Price (score)
$102 Much cheaper.
+50%
$205
Age
Newest
62 Months 57 Months Slightly more recent.
+8%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts 65 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
6 threads 16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+167%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
2.9 GHz 3.6 GHz Faster base frequency.
+24%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.1 GHz 4.4 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+7%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
696 Pts 1479 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+112%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
614 Pts 1358 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+121%
Series
CPU Architecture
Coffee Lake Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

Intel’s Core i5-9400F is a hex-core 9th generation Coffee Lake desktop processor. It features base / boost clocks of 2.9 / 4.1 GHz, 9 MB of cache, a 65W TDP and it ships with a cooler but it does not have integrated graphics like the “non-F” variants. Although the 9400F is compatible with the enthusiast grade Z390 chipset it is normally paired with a better value for money B360 motherboard. At its launch the i5-9400F retailed for $180 but prices have dropped to the point ($135) that it now represents an excellent value proposition to gamers. Comparing the i5-9400F to the Ryzen 3600 shows that the 3600 is 8% better for quad-core processing but it costs 40% ($50) more than the 9400F. Ordinarily higher quad-core performance would result in better gaming but the Ryzen 3000 memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. Gamers can invest the $50 savings in a better GPU, for example by upgrading from a 2060S to a 2070S. Since the GPU makes the most difference to gaming, the end result is a system which offers far superior real world gaming performance for similar money. For those gamers who demand the best of the best, it is necessary to jump to one of the higher frequency SKUs such as the 9600K but for everyone else the i5-9400F offers unparalleled value. [Aug '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU. Out of the box, the 3700X, 3600X and 3600 achieve similar quad core speeds but the 16 threaded 3700X is 30% faster at multi-core computations than the 12 threaded 3600X. Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26% faster at 64-core computations but 13% slower for gaming and desktop (sub eight core performance). Unlike lower end Ryzen 3000 SKUs, the 3700X comes with a half decent cooler but AMD should not have bothered since a $20 aftermarket cooler is still quieter, easier to change, and better at cooling. With a Gammaxx 400 cooler we were able to maintain a 43.25x OC during our EFps tests. We had to use a fixed clock OC (rather than Offset/PBO) to avoid significant frame drops in Fortnite. With strong single-core scores, the 3700X should offer very strong gaming performance but in reality it is let down by its memory controller, which, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. The heavily hyped 3700X, paired with a 2060S, offers real world gaming performance comparable to the $80 USD entry level 4-core, 4-thread Intel Core i3-9100F. At $320 USD, the 3700X offers reasonable value to full time media encoders but general desktop users, gamers and even streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The 3700X severely bottlenecks a 2070S: gamers should investigate the 9600K, which is both cheaper and faster[Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback