IntelBX80677I57600K
AMDFD9370FHHKWOF

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.8GHz, Kaby Lake.
Release date: Q1 2017.

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.4GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 204,060 user samples
195,006 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 297th / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
9,054 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Base clock 5 GHz
Worst Bench: 55% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 55% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 539th / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
75.8 % Faster effective speed.
+21%
62.5 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
85.4 Pts +4% 82.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
120 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+77%
67.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
237 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+85%
128 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
379 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+63%
232 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
403 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+6%
380 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
95.8 Pts +4% 92.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
144 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+75%
82.2 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
286 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+81%
158 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
490 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+69%
290 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
504 Pts +5% 481 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,709,837 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.27 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
84.1 % Better value.
+22%
69 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
75 % Much more popular.
+42%
53 %
Price
Price (score)
$190 +2% $194
Age
Newest
87 Months Much more recent.
+33%
129 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
91 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+59%
220 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads 8 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+56%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.8 GHz 4.4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+16%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.2 GHz 4.7 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+12%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
510 Pts Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.
+6%
482 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
407 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+5%
386 Pts
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
HD 630 None
Series
CPU Architecture
Kaby Lake Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 AM3+
Series
CPU Architecture
Kaby Lake Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
HD 630 None
ADVERTISEMENT

The i5-7600K targets high end gamers, it sits just behind the flagship i7-7700K in Intel’s Kaby Lake lineup. The 7600K will likely be the most popular gaming CPU of 2017 (some competition from AMD’s upcoming Zen/Ryzen CPUs, would be very welcome). Comparing the 7600K and 6600K shows that the two processors are very closely matched and comparing the 7600K vs the hyper-threaded 7700K highlights the relative strength of the 7700K for workstation performance. There are no significant architectural differences between Kaby Lake and Skylake so, when fully overclocked, the two generations should perform similarly but Kaby Lake offers faster base clocks, improved speed shift technology which helps CPU responsiveness, and better integrated graphics[Jan '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX-9370 is the slightly lower clocked (4.4 GHz) version of AMD's flagship FX-9 range of desktop processors. The FX-9590 comes clocked at 4.7 GHz with a staggering turbo clock of 5 GHz. Comparing the 9370 and 9590 versions shows that there is only 3% between the two processors at stock clocks but when overclocked they both have an identical performance profile. Given that the 9590 costs nearly 25% more the 9370 should be the obvious choice. Both of these processors have superb multi-core performance but they both lag Intel when it comes to single and dual-core workloads. Until AMD can improve single core performance they will continue to struggle in the high end PC market. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback