IntelBX80605I5750
Intel

4 Cores, 4 Threads @2.66GHz, Nehalem.
Release date: Q3 2009.

2 Cores, 4 Threads @3.6 GHz, Clarkdale.
Release date ≤ Q1 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 44,577 user samples
43,796 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 559th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
781 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 40% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 40% Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 741st / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
61.5 % Faster effective speed.
+19%
51.8 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
85.6 Pts Lower memory latency.
+27%
67.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
66.7 Pts 86.3 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+29%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
131 Pts 151 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+15%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
218 Pts +3% 211 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
228 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+7%
213 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
94.3 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+26%
75 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
85.1 Pts 96.9 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+14%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
172 Pts 183 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+6%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
299 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+27%
236 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
304 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+28%
237 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,719,082 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.1 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
89.2 % Much better value.
+76%
50.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
51 %
Price
Price (score)
$72 Much cheaper.
+76%
$300
Age
Newest
177 Months 122+ Months Much more recent.
+31%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
300 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+26%
238 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
230 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+7%
214 Pts
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'09 Q2'10
Cache
Cache
8 MB SmartCache 4 MB SmartCache
Embedded Options Available
Embedded Options Available
Yes No
Lithography
Lithography
45 nm 32 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$193.00 - $213.00 $305.00
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz 3.86 GHz
Processing Die Size
Processing Die Size
296 mm2 81 mm2
# of Processing Die Transistors
# of Processing Die Transistors
774 million 382 million
Hyper-Threading Tech
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡
No Yes
vPro Tech
Intel® vPro™ Technology ‡
No Yes
AES New Instructions
Intel® AES New Instructions
No Yes
Trusted Execution Tech
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology ‡
No Yes

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core i5-750 is a mid-range quad core, four thread desktop processor which is part of the Nehalem series launched in Q3 2009. Considering the age of this processor, its effective speed of 67 is damn impressive. It has a base frequency of 2.66 GHz, which boosts to 3.2 GHz turbo when under load and can be significantly extended beyond by overclocking. Combined with a decent graphics card, the i5-750 should give a reasonable gaming experience even by today’s standards. There are of course faster modern alternatives such as the i5-4690K, but if you already have the 750 with an older graphics card it's likely that your GPU will need updating before the CPU. Comparing the 750 and 4690K shows that the 4690K has an effective speed of 109 which is 62% faster than the now five years old i5-750. [Nov '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback