IntelBX80662I56600
AMDYD195XA8AEWOF

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.3GHz, Skylake.
Release date: Q3 2015.

16 Cores, 32 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q3 2017.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 104,329 user samples
80,688 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 77% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 47% Great: 77%
SPEED RANK: 452nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
23,641 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 284th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
67.6 % 76.7 % Faster effective speed.
+13%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
78.7 Pts Lower memory latency.
+14%
69.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
100 Pts 115 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+15%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
201 Pts 228 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+13%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
324 Pts 450 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+39%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
345 Pts 876 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+154%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
90.9 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+9%
83.4 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
112 Pts 125 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+12%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
222 Pts 247 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+11%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
399 Pts 493 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+24%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
412 Pts 981 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+138%
Market Share
Based on 67,717,182 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.14 % Hugely higher market share.
+600%
0.02 %
Value
Value For Money
82.9 % +2% 81.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
63 % 63 %
Price
Price (score)
$132 Much cheaper.
+41%
$225
Age
Newest
103 Months 80 Months More recent.
+22%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+64%
180 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores 16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+300%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads 32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+700%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.3 GHz 3.4 GHz +3%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.9 GHz 4 GHz +3%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
414 Pts 2521 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+509%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
350 Pts 2190 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+526%
Series
CPU Architecture
Skylake Zen
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 TR4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
HD 530 None
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is finally here to seize the throne for high end desktop processors. The 1950X is the flagship of the Zen based Threadripper series which also includes the 12 core 1920X and the 8 core 1900X. The 1950X has a stock clock of 3.4 GHz increasing to a maximum single core boost of 4.0 GHz and features quad channel DDR4 and 64 PCI Express lanes. This processor is effectively two Ryzen 7 1800Xs glued together with Infinity Fabric (AMD’s scalable interconnecting technology), making the 1950X one of the physically largest CPUs on the consumer market. If you are considering this CPU, you will need a new X399 motherboard with a TR4 socket. Early benchmarks show the 1950X competing with Intel’s similarly priced i9-7900X. Whilst the 7900X has slightly higher single and quad core scores (10%-15%), the 1950X is around 35% faster for multi-core workloads. Content creators, and other core intensive task masters will not be disappointed. [Aug '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback