COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80646I54590
$188
AMDAD680KWOHLBOX
▲ 616,258 ▼
 $188 

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.3GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q3 2014.

VS
▲ 541,225 ▼

4 Cores, 4 Threads @4.1GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q2 2013.

Effective Speed 
+23%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 162,661 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
151,366 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 45% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 45% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 526th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
11,295 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 39% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 39% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 753rd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		63.5 % Faster effective speed.
+23% 		51.5 %
Average Score 
+42%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		76.9 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8% 		71 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		90.6 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+36% 		66.6 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		178 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+48% 		120 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		287 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+54% 		186 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		307 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+62% 		190 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+38%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		91.7 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+6% 		86.9 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		100 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+29% 		77.3 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		196 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+34% 		146 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		350 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+58% 		222 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		361 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+63% 		222 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+∞%
Market Share
Based on 67,719,158 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.35 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞% 		0 %
Value
Value For Money 		70.7 % Much better value.
+58% 		44.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		61 % More popular.
+13% 		54 %
Price
Price (score) 		$188 Much cheaper.
+60% 		$467
Nice To Haves 
+15%
Age
Newest 		117 Months Slightly more recent.
+10% 		130 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		84 Watts More energy efficient.
+16% 		100 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		4 cores 4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		4 threads 4 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		22 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+31% 		32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.3 GHz 4.1 GHz Faster base frequency.
+24%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		3.7 GHz 4.4 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+19%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		361 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+62% 		223 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		309 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+62% 		191 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Haswell Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1150 FM2
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 4600 8670D
Conclusion 
Average Bench 63.5%
Average Bench 51.5%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core i5-4590 is a slightly upgraded version of the i5-4570. The two processors are identical apart from a 100 MHz increase in base and turbo frequencies. Needless to say the two processors have almost identical effective speeds which is a little disappointing as Intel has simply re-released a near identical product. From a value for money perspective the 4590 does fare reasonably well although it probably has more multi-core horsepower than most use cases demand. For the majority of users, at stock clocks, the G3258 provides comparable performance but with a few simple BIOS adjustments the G3258 can be clocked up to 4.3 GHz where, even at half the price, it destroys the i5-4570 in single and dual core workloads. [Sep '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD A10-6800K is a Black Edition quad-core Richland APU based on second generation Bulldozer micro-architecture (codenamed Piledriver) launched in Q2 2013. It features Cayman-derived Integrated HD 8670 Graphics which are a marginal improvement on the Radeon HD 7660D graphics featured in the A10-6800K’s predecessor: the A10-5800K and which outperform the integrated graphics on comparable Intel Core i3 and i5 chips. The A10-6800K has a clock speed of 4.0 GHz, which automatically turbo boosts to 4.4 GHz when needed and can further be overclocked to 5.0 GHz on air cooling. The A10-6800K scores an effective speed of 73 which is okay, but compared to the similarly aged and priced i3-4130, it lacks in single-threaded performance. The A10-6800K is a good choice for those wanting reasonable CPU performance and integrated graphics on a budget. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
151,366
11,295
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback