COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX8071512400F
IntelBX80646I34370
VS
▲ 521,221 ▼

2 Cores, 4 Threads @3.8GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Effective Speed 
+49%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 50,390 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
48,886 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 105% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 92% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 92% Great: 105%
SPEED RANK: 87th / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
1,504 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 52% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 52% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 487th / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		98 % Much faster effective speed.
+49% 		65.8 %
Average Score 
+109%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		81.6 Pts 85.9 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+5%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		172 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+72% 		100 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		330 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+88% 		176 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		614 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+131% 		266 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		974 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+261% 		270 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+98%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		91.1 Pts 94.7 Pts +4%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		182 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+61% 		113 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		352 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+68% 		210 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		673 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+124% 		301 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1029 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+242% 		301 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+∞%
Market Share
Based on 67,709,837 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		1.77 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞% 		0 %
Value
Value For Money 		120 % Better value.
+14% 		105 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		99 % Hugely more popular.
+90% 		52 %
Price
Price (score) 		$134 $50 Much cheaper.
+63%
Nice To Haves 
+124%
Age
Newest 		27 Months Much more recent.
+77% 		115 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		65 Watts 54 Watts More energy efficient.
+17%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		6 cores Hugely higher core count.
+200% 		2 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		12 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+200% 		4 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		10 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+55% 		22 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		2.5 GHz 3.8 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+52%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.4 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+16% 		3.8 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1220 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+304% 		302 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1178 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+335% 		271 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Alder Lake Haswell
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1700 FCLGA1150
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None HD 4600
Conclusion 
Average Bench 98%
Average Bench 65.8%
ADVERTISEMENT

Intel’s Alder Lake i5-12400F offers six hyper-threaded performance cores at an MSRP of just $180 USD. This represents excellent value for consumers and, in particular, gamers. It has a boost frequency of 4.4 GHz, 18 MB of L3 cache and a TDP of 65W. The F-version of the CPU does not have integrated graphics, however this will be of little concern to gamers with discrete GPUs. Whilst Intel’s overclockable i5-12600K has four additional efficiency cores and offers around 12% more performance than the 12400F, it also costs around 50% more. The 12400F offers great value, but to achieve optimal performance the requisite B660 motherboard (which supports 3200+ RAM) is, at least for now, difficult to find at reasonable ($150 USD) prices. AMD’s top value hex-core Ryzen 5 5600X offers similar performance for 50% more money. Despite Intel’s price / performance lead, AMD’s prolific marketers (forums, youtube, reddit etc.) have historically outsold Intel whilst carrying a similar handicap. [Jan '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i3-4370 is a mid-range dual-core four threaded 4th generation (Haswell) processor. It was released in Q3 2014 and thanks to its base frequency of 3.8 GHz, it scores a very respectable 96 for effective speed. Whilst this is fast enough to run nearly all applications smoothly, 3D graphics performance is limited by the integrated Intel HD Graphics 4600. Although the 4370 is currently the fastest i3, it’s worth considering the i3-4160 which offers significantly better value for money. Comparing the 4160 and 4370 shows that the 4160 is 22% cheaper but only 5% slower in terms of effective speed. [Nov '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
48,886
1,504
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback