IntelBX8070811400F
IntelBX80646I34350

6 Cores, 12 Threads @2.6GHz, Rocket Lake.
Release date: Q1 2021.

2 Cores, 4 Threads @3.6GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q2 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 2,708 user samples
2,271 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 86% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 86% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 24th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
437 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Base clock 3.6 GHz
Worst Bench: 54% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 54% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 401st / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
97.8 % Much faster effective speed.
+49%
65.8 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
84.5 Pts 87.9 Pts +4%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
159 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+65%
96.5 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
314 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+86%
169 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
596 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+135%
254 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
936 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+264%
257 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
94 Pts 95 Pts +1%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
166 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+55%
107 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
331 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+62%
204 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
647 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+131%
280 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
1018 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+262%
281 Pts
Market Share
Based on 43,966,946 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.19 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
104 % Much better value.
+36%
76.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
97 % Hugely more popular.
+87%
52 %
Price
Price (score)
$220 $160 Cheaper.
+27%
Age
Newest
2 Months Hugely more recent.
+98%
85 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts 54 Watts More energy efficient.
+17%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores Hugely higher core count.
+200%
2 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+200%
4 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+36%
22 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
2.6 GHz 3.6 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+38%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.4 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+22%
3.6 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1188 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+318%
284 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1137 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+337%
260 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Rocket Lake Haswell
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1200 FCLGA1150
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None HD 4600
ADVERTISEMENT

The Rocket Lake i5-11400F paired with a B560 motherboard and 3200 RAM ($365 USD) offers unprecedented value for money to gamers. It completely prices AMD's 5000 series out of the market. Rocket Lake brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) which translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i3-4350 is a refreshed version of the Haswell i3-4330. The newer i3-4350 has received a 100 MHz increase in clock speed which translates to a performance improvement of 2.8%. With an effective speed of 93.5 the i3-4350 is no slouch and offers performance that's slightly above the average of the ten group leaders. Similar to the G3258, the 4350 has a performance profile which favours single and dual core workloads. Comparing the G3258 and 4350 shows that not only does the G3258 offer far better overclocked performance but it also costs less than half as much as the i3-4350. Although the i3-4350 is not a bad processor, there are relatively few use cases that would justify its price when compared to the stellar G3258. [Jul '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $300Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback