UserBenchmark: Intel Core i3-12100F vs i5-11400F

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

IntelBX8070811400F

BUY • $116

IntelBX8071512100F

BUY • $93

BenchYourCPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 58,469 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

46,609 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 101% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 88% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)

Poor: 88% Great: 101%

SPEED RANK: 116^th / 1442

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

11,860 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 99% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)

Poor: 90% Great: 99%

SPEED RANK: 117^th / 1442

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 80%

Battleship


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		94.2 %	+0%		94.1 %


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	87.2 Pts	+4%	83.8 Pts
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	147 Pts		172 Pts	Faster single-core speed. +17%
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	285 Pts		323 Pts	Faster dual-core speed. +13%
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	544 Pts		565 Pts	+4%
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	855 Pts	Slightly faster octa-core speed. +9%	788 Pts


Memory OC Memory Latency	95 Pts	+4%	91 Pts
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	153 Pts		178 Pts	Faster OC single-core speed. +16%
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	303 Pts		344 Pts	Faster OC dual-core speed. +14%
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	588 Pts		647 Pts	Faster OC quad-core speed. +10%
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	913 Pts	Faster OC octa-core speed. +11%	823 Pts

Market Share

Based on 67,713,254 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.8 %	Much higher market share. +51%	0.53 %
Value Value For Money	120 %		127 %	Slightly better value. +6%
User Rating UBM User Rating	90 %		98 %	Slightly more popular. +9%
Price Price (score)	$116		$93	Cheaper. +20%


Age Newest	36 Months		27 Months	More recent. +25%
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watts		58 Watts	More energy efficient. +11%
Cores CPU Processing Cores	6 cores	Much higher core count. +50%	4 cores
Threads CPU Processing Threads	12 threads	Much higher thread count. +50%	8 threads
Lithography Manufacturing process	14 nm		10 nm	Newer manufacturing. +29%
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	2.6 GHz		3.3 GHz	Faster base frequency. +27%
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	4.4 GHz	+2%	4.3 GHz
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	1120 Pts	Much faster OC 64-core speed. +35%	828 Pts
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	1049 Pts	Much faster 64-core speed. +32%	795 Pts


Series CPU Architecture	Rocket Lake	Alder Lake
Socket Motherboard Socket	FCLGA1200	FCLGA1700
Graphics Integrated Graphics	None	None

The Rocket Lake i5-11400F paired with a B560 motherboard and 3200 RAM ($365 USD) offers unprecedented value for money to gamers. It completely prices AMD's 5000 series out of the market. Rocket Lake brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) which translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. ^{[Mar '21 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Gaming is more accessible with the i3-12100F: Intel’s entry level Alder Lake desktop processor. Higher end Alder Lake processors feature a combination of performance and efficiency cores, however, the 12100F contains just four hyper-threaded Golden Cove performance cores. It has a max boost frequency of 4.3 GHz, 12 MB of L3 cache and a 58W TDP. The 12100F is keenly priced at around $130 USD and needs to be paired with a new chipset such as the B660. Only users with discrete GPUs should consider “F” models as they do not have integrated graphics. Whilst a budget PC built around the 12100F represents unbeatable value for money, the 6-core i5-12400F, with 50% stronger multi-core, is a better option for gamers with 3060+ tier GPUs. AMD do not have any CPUs competing in this price segment. Entry level gamers, who cannot find reasonably priced discrete GPUs, could consider the similarly performing Ryzen 5 5600G APU which has integrated RX Vega graphics that are around three times faster than Intel's UHD 730. ^{[Jan '22 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback