UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 3 3300X vs Intel Core i3-8350K

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

IntelBX80684I38350K

BUY • $100

AMD100-100000159BOX

BUY • $150

BenchYourCPU

Watch Comparable Gameplay: 9350KF vs 3300X


CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max	270 EFps	Slightly Better CSGO EFps. +8%	251 EFps
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max	108 EFps	Slightly Better GTAV EFps. +9%	99 EFps
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max	134 EFps	+2%	131 EFps
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max	125 EFps	Better PUBG EFps. +11%	113 EFps
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max	145 EFps	Better Fortnite EFps. +13%	128 EFps

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 38,786 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

23,493 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 93% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)

Poor: 68% Great: 93%

SPEED RANK: 214^th / 1442

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

15,293 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 89% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 69% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)

Poor: 69% Great: 89%

SPEED RANK: 242^nd / 1442

Gaming 80%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 68%

Battle cruiser


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		81.7 %	+2%		79.7 %


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	89 Pts	Lower memory latency. +15%	77.3 Pts
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	123 Pts		137 Pts	Faster single-core speed. +11%
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	245 Pts		257 Pts	+5%
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	428 Pts		443 Pts	+4%
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	442 Pts		662 Pts	Much faster octa-core speed. +50%


Memory OC Memory Latency	96.6 Pts	Lower OC memory latency. +10%	87.6 Pts
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	146 Pts		147 Pts	+1%
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	290 Pts	+0%	289 Pts
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	544 Pts	Slightly faster OC quad-core speed. +9%	500 Pts
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	557 Pts		748 Pts	Much faster OC octa-core speed. +34%

Market Share

Based on 67,711,889 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.04 %	Hugely higher market share. +100%	0.02 %
Value Value For Money	108 %	Better value. +15%	94.4 %
User Rating UBM User Rating	55 %		70 %	More popular. +27%
Price Price (score)	$100	Much cheaper. +33%	$150


Age Newest	79 Months		47 Months	Much more recent. +41%
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	91 Watts		65 Watts	More energy efficient. +29%
Cores CPU Processing Cores	4 cores		4 cores
Threads CPU Processing Threads	4 threads		8 threads	Hugely higher thread count. +100%
Lithography Manufacturing process	14 nm		7 nm	Much newer manufacturing. +50%
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	4 GHz	Slightly faster base frequency. +5%	3.8 GHz
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	4 GHz		4.3 GHz	Slightly faster turbo frequency. +8%
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	545 Pts		753 Pts	Much faster OC 64-core speed. +38%
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	445 Pts		677 Pts	Much faster 64-core speed. +52%


Series CPU Architecture	Coffee Lake	Zen2
Socket Motherboard Socket	FCLGA1151	AM4
Graphics Integrated Graphics	UHD 630	None

The quad core i3-8350K hails from Intel’s most recent (and as yet unreleased) generation of Coffee Lake processors. It has a stock clock of 4.0 GHz, 8MB of cache and a TDP of 95W. The 8350K is the first i3 processor to feature four cores (previous generations of i3s had two cores and four threads). With this eighth generation of processors, Intel has introduced a step change in their nomenclature which witnesses the old quad core i5s become the new quad core i3s. Our benchmarks show a 25% increase in effective speed between generations of i3 8350K vs 7350K and near equivalence between the outgoing i5-7600K and the new i3-8350K. Although the price points of Coffee Lake are not yet known, if Intel keep them roughly in line with the previous generations (i3 ~= $140) this will represent the best improvement in value for money since Sandy Bridge as the 8350K at $140 would be 34.8% cheaper than a 7600K at $215. Cynics among us will see this as an effort to fend off competition from AMD’s new multi-core Ryzen processors. It appears Intel may have been successful with this move as early benchmarks from the 8350K suggest that it beats the more expensive 8 core Ryzen 7 1700 in single and quad core performance by 25%. The 8350K is a great choice for gaming builds, but the budget will also need to factor in a complementary motherboard based on the new 300 series chipset. Expect the quad core i3-8100 which is the 8350K’s little sister featuring a base clock of 3.6 GHz, to follow shortly. ^{[Aug '17 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The 3300X is a 4-core Ryzen CPU. Priced at just $120 USD, it offers far better value to gamers than all the previous Ryzen CPUs. This is great news for potential buyers, but bad luck for gamers that recently spent nearly three times more on the 8-core 3700X. The reduction from eight to four cores results in more efficient caching and higher boost clocks. AMD’s marketing has abruptly broken from the firmly established “moar cores” mantra to a conveniently realistic: four cores are actually okay. Shifting goalposts this quickly reveals an unhealthy focus on first time buyers and a brazen disregard for existing customers. Sales tactics aside, unfortunately the 3300X remains constrained by architectural latency and the associated gaming bottleneck (frame drops). Comparing an overclocked 3300X pegged at 4425 MHz to a stock Intel Core i3-10100 running at 4100 MHz shows that the i3-10100 delivers better gaming performance in four out of five games. The 10100 also includes an iGPU with QuickSync hardware encoding. Since additional cores make little difference to gamers, there are no significant upgrades beyond the 3300X in the Ryzen product stack. In order to achieve better gaming performance, it is necessary to upgrade to a higher tier Intel CPU. Despite the barrage of anonymous hearsay pushed on social media, users will be hard pressed to find actual use cases that favor the 3300X over the i3-10100, especially when the 10100 is not handicapped by 2666 MHz RAM. Gamers are bottlenecked by the Ryzen architecture and desktop users need integrated graphics. ^{[Jun '20 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback