UserBenchmark: Intel Core i3-10100 vs i5-11600K

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

IntelBX8070110100

BUY • $94

IntelBX8070811600K

BUY • $180

BenchYourCPU

Watch Gameplay


CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max	228 EFps	296 EFps	Better CSGO EFps. +30%
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max	102 EFps	108 EFps	Slightly Better GTAV EFps. +6%
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max	139 EFps	142 EFps	+2%
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max	118 EFps	143 EFps	Better PUBG EFps. +21%
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max	131 EFps	134 EFps	+2%

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 68,529 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

24,563 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 86% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 65% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)

Poor: 65% Great: 86%

SPEED RANK: 240^th / 1442

Gaming 80%

Battleship

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

43,966 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 108% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 91% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)

Poor: 91% Great: 108%

SPEED RANK: 76^th / 1442

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		79.9 %			99.3 %	Faster effective speed. +24%


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	85.3 Pts	88.4 Pts	+4%
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	120 Pts	162 Pts	Much faster single-core speed. +35%
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	229 Pts	313 Pts	Much faster dual-core speed. +37%
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	402 Pts	592 Pts	Much faster quad-core speed. +47%
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	596 Pts	945 Pts	Much faster octa-core speed. +59%


Memory OC Memory Latency	94.7 Pts	95.4 Pts	+1%
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	126 Pts	172 Pts	Much faster OC single-core speed. +37%
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	250 Pts	338 Pts	Much faster OC dual-core speed. +35%
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	444 Pts	661 Pts	Much faster OC quad-core speed. +49%
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	659 Pts	1034 Pts	Much faster OC octa-core speed. +57%

Market Share

Based on 67,752,815 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.23 %		0.3 %	Much higher market share. +30%
Value Value For Money	108 %		112 %	+4%
User Rating UBM User Rating	90 %		90 %
Price Price (score)	$94	Much cheaper. +48%	$180


Age Newest	47 Months		36 Months	More recent. +23%
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watts	Much more energy efficient. +48%	125 Watts
Cores CPU Processing Cores	4 cores		6 cores	Much higher core count. +50%
Threads CPU Processing Threads	8 threads		12 threads	Much higher thread count. +50%
Lithography Manufacturing process	14 nm		14 nm
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	3.6 GHz		3.9 GHz	Slightly faster base frequency. +8%
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	4.3 GHz		4.9 GHz	Faster turbo frequency. +14%
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	664 Pts		1256 Pts	Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +89%
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	611 Pts		1165 Pts	Hugely faster 64-core speed. +91%


Series CPU Architecture	Comet Lake	Rocket Lake
Socket Motherboard Socket	FCLGA1200	FCLGA1200
Graphics Integrated Graphics	UHD 630	UHD 750

The i3-10100 is Intel’s entry level 10th generation Comet Lake processor and represents the best value for money within the line-up. This quad-core hyper-threaded 65 Watt processor ships with a cooler and is capable of 4.3 GHz single and 4.1 GHz all core boosts. Although the i3-10100 requires a new LGA1200 motherboard, Intel have guaranteed that LGA1200 will be compatible with the next generation of Rocket Lake CPUs, expected later this year. Running at stock (2666 MHz) RAM frequency handicaps performance by as much as 15% so gamers should pair the 10100 with a Z490 motherboard. This will both open an upgrade path to higher tier "K" tier CPUs and unlock higher XMP RAM speeds (here is one of the builds from our EFps test lab). When paired with an RTX 2060S, the 10100 lags just 13% behind the i9-10900K flagship. The 10100 allows budget gamers to allocate more money towards a better GPU which often results in a stronger overall gaming system. At a retail price of $122 USD, the 10100 competes against AMD’s quad-core Ryzen 3 3300X. Game EFps and effective speed benchmarks show that the 10100’s lower memory latency gives it the edge. In addition, unlike the 3300X, the 10100 also packs integrated graphics with Quick Sync hardware encoding, which alleviates the need for desktop users to purchase a separate GPU. In order to achieve better value for money, it is necessary to consider the older generation 9100F, which, when paired with a 2060S, is 39% cheaper ($75 USD) for comparable gaming performance. ^{[Jun '20 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The i5-11600K is the best value "top tier" CPU in Intel’s 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S lineup. With a simple overclock it offers almost the same levels of performance as the 11900K. Rocket Lake brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) which translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. ^{[Mar '21 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback