COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80646G1820
IntelBX8070110600K
▲ 51468 ▼

2 Cores, 2 Threads @2.7GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q1 2014.

VS
▲ 899,406 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @4.1GHz, Comet Lake.
Release date: Q2 2020.

Effective Speed 
+87%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 74,962 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
4,011 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 58% Base clock 2.7 GHz
Worst Bench: 35% Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 35% Great: 58%
SPEED RANK: 816th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
70,951 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 100% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 81% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 81% Great: 100%
SPEED RANK: 128th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		49.2 % 92.2 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+87%
Average Score 
+196%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		75.4 Pts 90.5 Pts Lower memory latency.
+20%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		70.9 Pts 137 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+93%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		134 Pts 268 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+100%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		136 Pts 505 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+271%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		139 Pts 825 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+494%
Overclocked Score 
+186%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		91.6 Pts 96.6 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+5%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		79.6 Pts 149 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+87%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		157 Pts 296 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+89%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		157 Pts 569 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+262%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		157 Pts 918 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+485%
Value & Sentiment 
+∞%
Market Share
Based on 67,715,806 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0 % 0.37 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money 		76.4 % 111 % Much better value.
+45%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		51 % 89 % Much more popular.
+75%
Price
Price (score) 		$56 Much cheaper.
+61% 		$144
Nice To Haves 
+239%
Age
Newest 		123 Months 47 Months Much more recent.
+62%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		53 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+58% 		125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		2 cores 6 cores Hugely higher core count.
+200%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		2 threads 12 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+500%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		22 nm 14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+36%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		2.7 GHz 4.1 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+52%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		2.7 GHz 4.8 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+78%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		157 Pts 1154 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+635%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		139 Pts 1041 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+649%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Haswell Comet Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1150 FCLGA1200
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD UHD 630
Launch Date
Launch Date 		Q1'14 Q2'20
Cache
Cache 		2 MB SmartCache 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions 		SSE4.1/4.2 Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Embedded Options Available
Embedded Options Available 		Yes No
Lithography
Lithography 		22 nm 14 nm
Bus Speed
Bus Speed 		5 GT/s DMI2 8 GT/s
Thermal Solution Specification
Thermal Solution Specification 		PCG 2013C PCG 2015D
Max Memory Size
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type) 		32 GB 128 GB
Memory Types
Memory Types 		DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V DDR4-2666
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth 		21.3 GB/s 41.6 GB/s
ECC Memory Supported
ECC Memory Supported ‡ 		Yes No
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡ 		Intel® HD Graphics Intel® UHD Graphics 630
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency 		1.05 GHz 1.20 GHz
Graphics Video Max Memory
Graphics Video Max Memory 		1.7 GB 64 GB
Turbo Boost Tech
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology ‡ 		No 2
Hyper-Threading Tech
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡ 		No Yes
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡ 		No Yes
Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) 		No Yes
AES New Instructions
Intel® AES New Instructions 		No Yes
Trusted Execution Tech
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology ‡ 		No Yes
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision 		Up to 3.0 3

More specs » More specs »
Conclusion 
Average Bench 49.2%
Average Bench 92.2%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Celeron G1820 is a value orientated dual core processor. It has passable single and dual-core performance but its multi-core performance is extremely weak. The majority of desktop CPU tasks are single and dual core so weak multi-core performance isn't generally a problem. The G1820 is priced very well and consequently represents great value for money. Comparing the G1820 and Pentium G3420 shows that the G3420 offers nearly 20% more performance which, particularly in the single and dual core categories, makes for a far snappier and satisfying desktop experience. The G1820 is a great value option but paying just a little more for a G3420 will be well worth it for most users. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Intel’s tenth gen, six-core i5-10600K is one of the fastest consumer CPUs currently available. Out of the box, its maximum all core frequency is 4.5 GHz, but a simple overclock allows all 12 threads to hit 5.0 GHz. Although a new Z490 (LGA1200) motherboard is required, Intel have indicated that LGA1200 will remain compatible with Rocket Lake CPUs which are due later this year. The eight-core Ryzen 3700X currently competes in the 10600K’s price bracket. CPU based encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn but If dedicated hardware such as NVENC or QuickSync is not an option, the 3700X can outperform the 10600K in encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU. Meanwhile, the 10600K is better for almost everything else. Currently, the real problem with the 10600K, and much of the Comet Lake line up, is availability. Whilst there was a paper launch in Q2 2020, at the time of writing, the 10600K is still largely unavailable for purchase. In order to achieve better value for money, without compromising on gaming performance, it is necessary to consider the older generation 9600K which is 26% cheaper and offers similar gaming performance. [Jun '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
4,011
70,951
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback