AMDYD195XA8AEWOF
AMDYD1700BBAEBOX

16 Cores, 32 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q3 2017.

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.0GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q1 2017.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 168,116 user samples
23,641 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 284th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
144,475 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 422nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
76.7 % Faster effective speed.
+11%
69 %
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
3 % Hitm2 14%, TWarW2 1%, SotTR 7%, ACO 14%, MESoW 1%, Divis2 0% FarC5 3%, StrangeB 3%, MetroEx 6%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
69.3 Pts 70 Pts +1%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
115 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+19%
96.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
228 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+20%
190 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
450 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+23%
366 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
876 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+37%
640 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
83.4 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+6%
78.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
125 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+8%
116 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
247 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+6%
233 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
493 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+8%
456 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
981 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+23%
798 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,716,400 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.02 % 0.07 % Hugely higher market share.
+250%
Value
Value For Money
81.3 % Slightly better value.
+7%
76.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
63 % 69 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
Price
Price (score)
$225 $195 Cheaper.
+13%
Age
Newest
80 Months Slightly more recent.
+6%
85 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
180 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+64%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
16 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+13%
3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+8%
3.7 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2521 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+114%
1178 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2190 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+123%
980 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen Zen
Socket
Motherboard Socket
TR4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is finally here to seize the throne for high end desktop processors. The 1950X is the flagship of the Zen based Threadripper series which also includes the 12 core 1920X and the 8 core 1900X. The 1950X has a stock clock of 3.4 GHz increasing to a maximum single core boost of 4.0 GHz and features quad channel DDR4 and 64 PCI Express lanes. This processor is effectively two Ryzen 7 1800Xs glued together with Infinity Fabric (AMD’s scalable interconnecting technology), making the 1950X one of the physically largest CPUs on the consumer market. If you are considering this CPU, you will need a new X399 motherboard with a TR4 socket. Early benchmarks show the 1950X competing with Intel’s similarly priced i9-7900X. Whilst the 7900X has slightly higher single and quad core scores (10%-15%), the 1950X is around 35% faster for multi-core workloads. Content creators, and other core intensive task masters will not be disappointed. [Aug '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is the least powerful of three new Ryzen 7 CPUs. The 1700 model has base and turbo clocks of 3.0 and 3.7 GHz respectively. Both of its more expensive siblings, the 1700X and 1800X, have higher clocks but they also have TDPs of 95 watts whereas the 1700 is rated at just 65 watts. Comparing IPC between Ryzen and Kaby Lake shows that Kaby Lake leads by a maximum of 9% which is great news for workstation users as this allows the 1700 to beat Intel's 6850K in multi-core workloads at almost half the price. Although the 1700 has great IPC it's somewhat limited by its relatively low (by Kaby Lake standards) clock speed which holds it back a little in both gaming and desktop workloads. For multi-core workstation use, the Ryzen 7 1700 represents the best value for money we have ever seen. [Mar '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback