AMD100-100000514WOF
IntelBX8071513700K

16 Cores, 32 Threads @4.5GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 44,199 user samples
3,143 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 124% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 95% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 95% Great: 124%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
41,056 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 131% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 120% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 120% Great: 131%
SPEED RANK: 10th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
114 % 126 % Faster effective speed.
+10%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
EldenR 0%, Civ6 4%, DoomE 0% 8 % Forza5 0%, AoE4 33%, Bord3 23%, FarC6 23%, WatchDL 4%, BFV 1%, CPunk 0%, RDR2 11%, CSGO 4%
22 Nov22|Gamers Nexus
Intel i7-13700K CPU Review & Bench...
SotTR 0%, CSGO 10% 5 % FarC6 9%, FinFant14 24%, GTAV 3%, R6S 4%, TWarW3 4%
20 Oct22|Tweakers
Intel 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake Re...
RDR2 5%, MetroEx 0%, TWarW3 1% 4 % FarC6 20%, F122 4%
06 Nov22|Tom's Hardware
Intel Core i7-13700K Review: Core ...
RDR2 3%, MSFS21 6% 10 % Hitm3 7%, FarC6 11%, WatchDL 15%, CPunk 18%, F121 18%, TWarW3 17%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
79.3 Pts 84.7 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
209 Pts 222 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+6%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
408 Pts 444 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+9%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
791 Pts 888 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+12%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1527 Pts 1676 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+10%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.4 Pts 93.4 Pts +2%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
221 Pts 230 Pts +4%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
436 Pts 459 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+5%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
857 Pts 915 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+7%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1685 Pts 1781 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+6%
Market Share
Based on 67,739,686 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.11 % 1.17 % Hugely higher market share.
+964%
Value
Value For Money
94.2 % 118 % Better value.
+25%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
61 % 96 % Much more popular.
+57%
Price
Price (score)
$549 $345 Much cheaper.
+37%
Age
Newest
18 Months 18 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
170 Watts 125 Watts More energy efficient.
+26%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
16 cores 16 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
32 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
24 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
5 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
10 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
4.5 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+32%
3.4 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.7 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+6%
5.4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
3877 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+20%
3235 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
3670 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+18%
3098 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen4 Raptor Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM5 FCLGA1700
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
RDNA2 UHD 770
ADVERTISEMENT

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Intel’s 13th gen. Raptor Lake CPUs offer around 10% faster gaming and 45% faster multi-core performance than their predecessors. The new CPUs are compatible with DDR4 memory and Z690/B660 ($150) motherboards. New high-end gaming builders need look no further than the 13600K. The 13600K beats AMD’s flagship 7950X in gaming and almost matches the 7900X in multi-core performance. Extreme workstation users may find value in the 13700K or 13900K. Gamers on a tight budget can save $40 USD with a 13600KF which is a 13600K without integrated graphics. Although Ryzen 7000 has weaker multi-core, weaker single-core, higher platform costs and higher unit prices AMD have a 3D joker up their sleeve (7800X3D est. 2023). Via “Advanced Marketing” on youtube, forums, reddit, and twitter AMD will demonstrate that their upcoming CPU is the “best in the world” and offer “proof” by way of a small handful of obscure workloads. Games that few people play e.g. (Factorio, SotTR) will be cherry picked, video footage of the gameplay/settings won’t be provided and frame drops will be conveniently ignored. This playbook has easily outsold Intel in recent years but with every overhyped release, consumers lose trust in AMD. Based on social media/press coverage, you would never guess that the combined market share for all of AMD’s Radeon 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers is just 2.12% (Steam stats). Meanwhile Nvidia’s RTX 2060 alone accounts for a whopping 5.03%. Largely thanks to marketing incompetence, Intel is existentially motivated to deliver material annual performance improvements. Consumers can look forward to Meteor Lake (14th gen) in less than a years time. [Oct '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback