CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
318 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+36%
233 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
108 EFps +3% 105 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
142 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+9%
130 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
133 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+7%
124 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
121 EFps 141 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+17%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 49,948 user samples
33,026 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 90% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 68th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
16,922 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 79% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 79% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 147th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
100 % Faster effective speed.
+13%
88.7 %
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
12 % BFV 5%, SotTR 12%, MetroEx 20%, Divis2 12%
07 Dec20|KitGuru
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Zen 3 CPU Review
17 % GTAV 25%, SotTR 46%, RDR2 3%, F120 11%, MetroEx 11%, Divis2 4%
05 Nov20|Linustechtips
Remember this day… - AMD Ryzen 500...
27 % GTAV 13%, SotTR 29%, MSFS20 27%, CSGO 46%, F120 21%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
81 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+6%
76.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
164 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+16%
141 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
326 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+18%
277 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
639 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+18%
541 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1232 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+19%
1032 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92.7 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+6%
87.5 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
180 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+19%
151 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
355 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+20%
297 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
697 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+20%
582 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1376 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+22%
1131 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,745,243 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.18 % Hugely higher market share.
+800%
0.02 %
Value
Value For Money
89.7 % Better value.
+15%
77.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
69 % More popular.
+28%
54 %
Price
Price (score)
$416 Slightly cheaper.
+8%
$450
Age
Newest
41 Months More recent.
+11%
46+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
3063 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+38%
2220 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2633 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+28%
2056 Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

The 16-core, 32-thread Ryzen 9 5950X is an impressive workhorse. It sits at the top of AMD’s latest Zen 3 based, 5000 series of CPUs and sends a clear message that AMD can beat Intel in terms of raw performance and core count. The 5950X has a boost clock speed of up to 4.9 GHz, a massive 72 MB cache and a TDP rating of 105W. Despite the “gaming” focus of AMD’s 5000 series launch marketing, the 5950X does not efficiently leverage all its 16 cores in gaming (as demonstrated by similar effective speed scores compared to the 12-core 5900X, 8-core 5800X and 6-core 5600X.) 16 cores are only suitable for professional use cases that have CPU processing needs which cannot be more efficiently met by a GPU or other dedicated hardware. There is no Intel equivalent with this number of cores, and the 5950X’s uniqueness is reflected in its $799 USD price tag, 45% more expensive than the 5900X. Gamers will get far higher FPS per dollar by allocating a higher proportion of their budget towards a better GPU rather than blowing $799 USD on the 5950X. Professional users that plan to use 32 concurrent threads at 100% load will find value in the 5950X. On the other hand, workstation users that rarely exceed 20 concurrent threads at 100% should consider the 10850K for around half the money. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The XT series of Ryzen CPUs barely outperform their cheaper X and non-X counterparts: 3600, 3600X, 3800X, 3900X. Outside of encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU the Ryzen architecture remains limited by relatively high latency and the associated gaming bottleneck (frame drops). Dedicated hardware such as NVENC or QuickSync remains far more efficient than CPU cores for encoding. CPU based encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn. The best value CPU amongst the Ryzen range is the 3300X which is the first design to focus on delivering lower latency, and therefore better performance where users need it, rather than “Moar Coars”. Aside from the army of anonymous influencers on social media (reddit, forums, youtube etc.), users will be hard pressed to find rational arguments that favor the XT variants over their cheaper predecessors. [Jul '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback