UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X vs 7900X

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD100-100000061WOF

BUY • $249

AMD100-100000589WOF

BUY • $394

BenchYourCPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 62,976 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

60,132 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 108% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 87% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)

Poor: 87% Great: 108%

SPEED RANK: 79^th / 1442

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 100%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 109%

UFO

2,844 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 126% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 105% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)

Poor: 105% Great: 126%

SPEED RANK: 27^th / 1442

Gaming 116%

UFO

Desktop 117%

UFO

Workstation 138%

UFO


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		99 %			116 %	Faster effective speed. +17%


10 Mar21\|HardwareLUXX Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...	26 %	BFV 9%, SotTR 18%, MetroEx 60%, Divis2 18%
20 Oct22\|Techpowerup Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...		CPunk 1%, RDR2 5%, DoomE 2%	9 %	Forza5 3%, AoE4 12%, Bord3 13%, FarC6 24%, WatchDL 12%, BFV 9%, EldenR 4%, Civ6 15%, CSGO 21%
22 Nov22\|Gamers Nexus Intel i7-13700K CPU Review & Bench...		TWarW3 1%	12 %	FarC6 18%, GTAV 20%, SotTR 11%, CSGO 23%, R6S 2%
20 Oct22\|Tweakers Intel 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake Re...		MetroEx 1%	11 %	FarC6 22%, RDR2 10%, F122 9%, TWarW3 14%


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	81.1 Pts	81.5 Pts	+0%
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	163 Pts	211 Pts	Faster single-core speed. +29%
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	320 Pts	411 Pts	Faster dual-core speed. +28%
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	626 Pts	804 Pts	Faster quad-core speed. +28%
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	1157 Pts	1536 Pts	Much faster octa-core speed. +33%


Memory OC Memory Latency	92.3 Pts	+0%	92.2 Pts
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	179 Pts		218 Pts	Faster OC single-core speed. +22%
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	356 Pts		434 Pts	Faster OC dual-core speed. +22%
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	694 Pts		863 Pts	Faster OC quad-core speed. +24%
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	1318 Pts		1693 Pts	Faster OC octa-core speed. +28%

Market Share

Based on 67,742,953 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.55 %	Hugely higher market share. +293%	0.14 %
Value Value For Money	102 %		105 %	+3%
User Rating UBM User Rating	72 %	More popular. +24%	58 %
Price Price (score)	$249	Much cheaper. +37%	$394


Age Newest	41 Months		18 Months	Much more recent. +56%
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	105 Watts	Much more energy efficient. +38%	170 Watts
Cores CPU Processing Cores	12 cores		12 cores
Threads CPU Processing Threads	24 threads		24 threads
Lithography Manufacturing process	7 nm		5 nm	Newer manufacturing. +29%
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	3.7 GHz		4.7 GHz	Faster base frequency. +27%
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	4.8 GHz		5.6 GHz	Faster turbo frequency. +17%
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	2290 Pts		2977 Pts	Much faster OC 64-core speed. +30%
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	2000 Pts		2800 Pts	Much faster 64-core speed. +40%


Series CPU Architecture	Zen3	Zen4
Socket Motherboard Socket	AM4	AM5
Graphics Integrated Graphics	None	RDNA2

The Ryzen 9 5900X is second in AMD’s line-up of new Zen 3 CPUs. The 12-core hyper-threaded processor has base/boost clock speeds of 3.7/4.8 GHz, a 70 MB cache and a TDP of 105W. The 5900X took center stage in the 5000 series launch presentation where AMD gunned for Intel’s “best gaming CPU” crown. They showed the 5900X as being 26% better for gaming than the previous generation’s Ryzen 9 3900XT, attributing this to the new architecture’s faster single core speeds and lower latency. AMD also stated that the 5900X achieves, on average, 6.8% faster gaming performance than Intel’s 10-core i9-10900K. The details around AMD’s testing were not disclosed but it is safe to assume that 6.8% is the highest average lead that AMD are willing to stand by. Our benchmarks show that the 5900X’s slightly faster cores and the 10900K’s slightly lower memory latency balance out to yield similar performance. Whilst presenting their figures, AMD admitted that their 3000 series CPUs were far from “best for gaming” and conceded that the 10900K is approximately 19% faster than the 3900XT (our effective speed marks the gap at just 14%). Despite this clear performance deficiency, AMD supported 3000 series sales with an aggressive and successful marketing campaign to easily outsell Intel over the last 12 months. Given the real performance uplift observed in the 5000 series, and the absence of any meaningful marketing from Intel, we expect CPU sales to shift even further in AMD’s favour. Gamers that do not wish to pay “marketing fees” should investigate Intel’s $175 USD 11400F, the $660 USD savings would be far better spent on a higher tier GPU. ^{[Nov '20 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. ^{[Sep '22 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback