CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
318 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+36%
233 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
108 EFps +3% 105 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
142 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+9%
130 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
133 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+7%
124 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
121 EFps 141 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+17%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 74,030 user samples
60,132 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 87% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 87% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 79th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
13,898 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 98% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 77% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 77% Great: 98%
SPEED RANK: 150th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
99 % Faster effective speed.
+12%
88.1 %
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
9 % BFV 6%, SotTR 5%, MetroEx 19%, Divis2 5%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review
5 % FarC5 21%, BFV 4%, SotTR 1%, Rage2 1%, Witcher3 1%, Civ6 6%, ACO 5%, MetroEx 1%, Sekiro 13%, Wolf2 1%
05 Nov20|Linustechtips
Remember this day… - AMD Ryzen 500...
27 % GTAV 15%, SotTR 30%, MSFS20 22%, CSGO 42%, F120 26%
26 Dec20|Tom's Hardware
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Review: The Pric...
30 % Hitm2 35%, FarC5 25%, Bord3 7%, ProjC3 49%, SotTR 43%, RDR2 28%, Divis2 19%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
81.1 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+6%
76.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
163 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+12%
145 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
320 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+13%
283 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
626 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+17%
535 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1157 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+23%
942 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92.3 Pts +4% 88.9 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
179 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+17%
153 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
356 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+17%
303 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
694 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+18%
588 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1318 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+25%
1051 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,714,564 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.63 % Hugely higher market share.
+950%
0.06 %
Value
Value For Money
102 % Better value.
+28%
79.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
72 % Much more popular.
+31%
55 %
Price
Price (score)
$249 Much cheaper.
+38%
$403
Age
Newest
41 Months Slightly more recent.
+9%
45+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2290 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+49%
1535 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2000 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+40%
1426 Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ryzen 9 5900X is second in AMD’s line-up of new Zen 3 CPUs. The 12-core hyper-threaded processor has base/boost clock speeds of 3.7/4.8 GHz, a 70 MB cache and a TDP of 105W. The 5900X took center stage in the 5000 series launch presentation where AMD gunned for Intel’s “best gaming CPU” crown. They showed the 5900X as being 26% better for gaming than the previous generation’s Ryzen 9 3900XT, attributing this to the new architecture’s faster single core speeds and lower latency. AMD also stated that the 5900X achieves, on average, 6.8% faster gaming performance than Intel’s 10-core i9-10900K. The details around AMD’s testing were not disclosed but it is safe to assume that 6.8% is the highest average lead that AMD are willing to stand by. Our benchmarks show that the 5900X’s slightly faster cores and the 10900K’s slightly lower memory latency balance out to yield similar performance. Whilst presenting their figures, AMD admitted that their 3000 series CPUs were far from “best for gaming” and conceded that the 10900K is approximately 19% faster than the 3900XT (our effective speed marks the gap at just 14%). Despite this clear performance deficiency, AMD supported 3000 series sales with an aggressive and successful marketing campaign to easily outsell Intel over the last 12 months. Given the real performance uplift observed in the 5000 series, and the absence of any meaningful marketing from Intel, we expect CPU sales to shift even further in AMD’s favour. Gamers that do not wish to pay “marketing fees” should investigate Intel’s $175 USD 11400F, the $660 USD savings would be far better spent on a higher tier GPU. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The XT series of Ryzen CPUs barely outperform their cheaper X and non-X counterparts: 3600, 3600X, 3800X, 3900X. Outside of encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU the Ryzen architecture remains limited by relatively high latency and the associated gaming bottleneck (frame drops). Dedicated hardware such as NVENC or QuickSync remains far more efficient than CPU cores for encoding. CPU based encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn. The best value CPU amongst the Ryzen range is the 3300X which is the first design to focus on delivering lower latency, and therefore better performance where users need it, rather than “Moar Coars”. Aside from the army of anonymous influencers on social media (reddit, forums, youtube etc.), users will be hard pressed to find rational arguments that favor the XT variants over their cheaper predecessors. [Jul '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback