AMD100-100000051WOF
AMDYD2600BBAFBOX

16 Cores, 32 Threads @3.5GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q4 2019.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+18%
198 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
105 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+9%
96 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
130 EFps 135 EFps +4%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
124 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+10%
113 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
141 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+23%
115 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 229,758 user samples
50,170 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 79% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 79% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 139th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
179,588 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 67% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 67% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 331st / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
89.3 % Faster effective speed.
+22%
73.3 %
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
13 % Hitm2 25%, FarC5 11%, StrangeB 2%, TWarW2 14%, SotTR 26%, ACO 14%, MetroEx 8%, MESoW 6%, Divis2 11%
21 May20|Optimum Tech
Intel i5-10600K Review - 6-core Ga...
25 % FarC5 20%, OverW 28%, SotTR 31%, RDR2 3%, StarWJFO 27%, CSGO 53%, R6S 13%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
77.2 Pts +1% 76.6 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
139 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+29%
108 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
276 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+31%
210 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
543 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+44%
377 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1074 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+73%
621 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
88.2 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+5%
83.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
150 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+27%
118 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
297 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+28%
232 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
580 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+30%
446 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1146 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+70%
676 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,717,333 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.09 % 0.42 % Hugely higher market share.
+367%
Value
Value For Money
75.8 % 91.3 % Better value.
+20%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
60 % 76 % More popular.
+27%
Price
Price (score)
$506 $125 Much cheaper.
+75%
Age
Newest
53 Months More recent.
+26%
72 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+167%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+167%
12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+42%
12 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.5 GHz +3% 3.4 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.7 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+21%
3.9 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2965 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+234%
889 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2737 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+242%
800 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3950X is the 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen 3 flagship. Although this CPU offers server levels of multi-core encoding performance, there are relatively few, if any, consumer use cases for the 3950X. Streamers are better off using dedicated hardware such as NVENC which encodes far more efficiently than any CPU. Gamers are better served by low latency gaming CPUs such as the 9600K for a fraction of the price. For example, comparing these two PCs shows that the 3950X build offers less than half the gaming performance. The only rational reason to put a 3950X in a gaming build is in exchange for sponsorship money. [Feb '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 5 2600, from AMD’s second generation (Zen+) of high-end desktop Ryzen processors, supersedes the first generation Ryzen 5 1600. The newer generation sees a lithography reduction from 14nm to 12nm, but no increase in the number of cores and threads (6 and 12 respectively) over the ground-breaking first generation which continues to surpass similarly priced Intel CPUs in terms of multi-core performance. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The 2600 appears to have a stock base/boost clock of 3.4 / 3.9 GHz compared to the 1600’s 3.2 / 3.6 GHz which is expected to result in a modest increase in effective speed that said, early benchmarks are inconclusive. Included in the expected retail price of about $200 is a Wraith Stealth cooler, so the 2600, like the 1600 before it, represents great value for workstation users. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. Even though the 2600 is plausible for multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback