CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps 313 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+34%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
105 EFps 109 EFps +4%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
130 EFps 138 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+6%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
124 EFps 142 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+15%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
141 EFps +4% 135 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 282,215 user samples
197,342 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 80% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 154th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
84,873 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 105% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 88% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 88% Great: 105%
SPEED RANK: 81st / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
87.9 % 98.9 % Faster effective speed.
+13%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
14 % BFV 13%, SotTR 12%, MetroEx 20%, Divis2 12%
05 Nov20|Anandtech
AMD Zen 3 Ryzen Deep Dive Review: ...
Civ6 4% 14 % Chernob 8%, DExMD 15%, FarC5 26%, StrangeB 2%, FinFant14 11%, Bord3 8%, F119 20%, GTAV 50%, RDR2 7%, GearsT 9%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
75 Pts 92 Pts Lower memory latency.
+23%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
139 Pts 146 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+5%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
275 Pts 288 Pts +5%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
539 Pts 567 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+5%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1030 Pts 1076 Pts +4%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.9 Pts 97.4 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+11%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
148 Pts 155 Pts +5%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
295 Pts 307 Pts +4%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
577 Pts 609 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+6%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1128 Pts 1193 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+6%
Market Share
Based on 67,712,080 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.11 % 0.47 % Hugely higher market share.
+327%
Value
Value For Money
79.8 % 98.1 % Better value.
+23%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
73 % Much more popular.
+30%
56 %
Price
Price (score)
$395 $286 Cheaper.
+28%
Age
Newest
57 Months 44+ Months More recent.
+23%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2224 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+12%
1987 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2036 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+10%
1845 Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Early Q3 of 2019 welcomes the Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD’s current top of the range, third generation Ryzen flagship which raises the bar for 64-core processing on desktop CPUs. This is AMD’s first Ryzen 9 processor and it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on their latest 7nm Zen 2 microarchitecture. The 3900X has a boost/base clock of 3.8/4.6 GHz, 64 MB of L3 cache (double the L3 on the rest of 3000 series), support for 3200 MHz DDR4 system memory and a TDP of 105W. All this, plus a Wraith Prism cooler, at a very reasonable launch price of $499 USD. By comparison, Intel’s 8-core, 16 thread i9-9900K is available for $479 USD (and requires a cooler: $30+ USD). Benchmarks illustrate that the overclocked 3900X leads by a whopping 41% for 64-core processing but that the 9900K maintains a 10% lead for gaming, desktop and other sub octa-core tasks. The 3900 memory controller is significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations and shows a better write throughput than the lower spec 3000 models, but it still shows relatively high latency which adversely impacts gaming. In terms of 64-core performance at this price point, there is no threat from Intel. The only real competitor is the upcoming (Q4, 2019) 16-core, 32-thread 3950X ($749 USD). The Ryzen 9 3900X is compatible with the new PCIe 4.0 enabled X570 motherboard via an AM4 socket, as well as 400 and 300 series motherboards. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i9-10850K is one of the best valued high-end CPUs from Intel in the past few years. Essentially, the 10850K is a worse binned 10900K, meaning that it may be a hundred or two megahertz slower than the 10900K and may not overclock as well as a standard 10900K. Otherwise, the 10850K is nearly identical to the 10900K. The 10850K is a very strong gaming and workstation CPU. With a sub-$400 price-tag, the 10850K has a similar pricing to the Ryzen 7 5800X. Gamers who want the faster overall gaming performance should go with the Ryzen 7 5800X, while users who want the best overclocking and a slightly better workstation/multi-core performance may want to stick with the 10850K. Note that Intel will be switching to a new chipset with their 12th generation Alder Lake processors, so the upgrade path is limited to Intel's 11th generation Rocket Lake processors, which is mostly not worth the upgrade. Also, as of Q1 of 2020, the 10900K remains $75-100 more expensive than the 10850K. There is just not enough performance gain for most users to justify the extra cost, so most users would be better off with a 10850K. At the end of the day, the 10850K is still a very solid choice for anyone who wants a high-performing intel processor that will last for a good few years before really needing a upgrade.  [May '21 NorthStar]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback