AMD100-100000023BOX
AMD100-100000061WOF
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps 318 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+36%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
105 EFps 108 EFps +3%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
130 EFps 142 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+9%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
124 EFps 133 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+7%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
141 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+17%
121 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 257,474 user samples
197,342 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 80% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 154th / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
60,132 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 87% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 87% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 79th / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
87.9 % 99 % Faster effective speed.
+13%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
13 % BFV 4%, SotTR 13%, MetroEx 22%, Divis2 13%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
WatchDL 4% 14 % Forza5 5%, AoE4 17%, Bord3 22%, FarC6 8%, BFV 26%, CPunk 4%, EldenR 18%, RDR2 4%, Civ6 27%, CSGO 44%, DoomE 1%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review
5 % FarC5 19%, BFV 2%, SotTR 1%, Rage2 1%, Witcher3 1%, Civ6 2%, ACO 2%, MetroEx 4%, Sekiro 14%, Wolf2 2%
06 Nov20|Gamers Nexus
Friendly Fire: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X C...
23 % SotTR 37%, GTAV 26%, RDR2 14%, TWarTKC 22%, F120 36%, ACO 5%
05 Nov20|Anandtech
AMD Zen 3 Ryzen Deep Dive Review: ...
19 % Chernob 7%, DExMD 12%, FarC5 29%, StrangeB 1%, FinFant14 19%, Bord3 9%, F119 16%, GTAV 53%, RDR2 4%, GearsT 17%, Civ6 37%
20 Oct22|Tweakers
Intel 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake Re...
RDR2 3%, F122 8% 3 % FarC6 6%, MetroEx 9%, TWarW3 11%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
75 Pts 81.1 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
139 Pts 163 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+17%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
275 Pts 320 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+16%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
539 Pts 626 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+16%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1030 Pts 1157 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+12%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.9 Pts 92.3 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+5%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
148 Pts 179 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+21%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
295 Pts 356 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+21%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
577 Pts 694 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+20%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1128 Pts 1318 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+17%
Market Share
Based on 67,709,701 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.08 % 0.57 % Hugely higher market share.
+613%
Value
Value For Money
79.8 % 102 % Better value.
+28%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
73 % +1% 72 %
Price
Price (score)
$395 $249 Much cheaper.
+37%
Age
Newest
57 Months 41 Months More recent.
+28%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
12 cores 12 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
24 threads 24 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm 7 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.8 GHz +3% 3.7 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.6 GHz 4.8 GHz +4%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2224 Pts 2290 Pts +3%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2036 Pts +2% 2000 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Zen3
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

Early Q3 of 2019 welcomes the Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD’s current top of the range, third generation Ryzen flagship which raises the bar for 64-core processing on desktop CPUs. This is AMD’s first Ryzen 9 processor and it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on their latest 7nm Zen 2 microarchitecture. The 3900X has a boost/base clock of 3.8/4.6 GHz, 64 MB of L3 cache (double the L3 on the rest of 3000 series), support for 3200 MHz DDR4 system memory and a TDP of 105W. All this, plus a Wraith Prism cooler, at a very reasonable launch price of $499 USD. By comparison, Intel’s 8-core, 16 thread i9-9900K is available for $479 USD (and requires a cooler: $30+ USD). Benchmarks illustrate that the overclocked 3900X leads by a whopping 41% for 64-core processing but that the 9900K maintains a 10% lead for gaming, desktop and other sub octa-core tasks. The 3900 memory controller is significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations and shows a better write throughput than the lower spec 3000 models, but it still shows relatively high latency which adversely impacts gaming. In terms of 64-core performance at this price point, there is no threat from Intel. The only real competitor is the upcoming (Q4, 2019) 16-core, 32-thread 3950X ($749 USD). The Ryzen 9 3900X is compatible with the new PCIe 4.0 enabled X570 motherboard via an AM4 socket, as well as 400 and 300 series motherboards. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 9 5900X is second in AMD’s line-up of new Zen 3 CPUs. The 12-core hyper-threaded processor has base/boost clock speeds of 3.7/4.8 GHz, a 70 MB cache and a TDP of 105W. The 5900X took center stage in the 5000 series launch presentation where AMD gunned for Intel’s “best gaming CPU” crown. They showed the 5900X as being 26% better for gaming than the previous generation’s Ryzen 9 3900XT, attributing this to the new architecture’s faster single core speeds and lower latency. AMD also stated that the 5900X achieves, on average, 6.8% faster gaming performance than Intel’s 10-core i9-10900K. The details around AMD’s testing were not disclosed but it is safe to assume that 6.8% is the highest average lead that AMD are willing to stand by. Our benchmarks show that the 5900X’s slightly faster cores and the 10900K’s slightly lower memory latency balance out to yield similar performance. Whilst presenting their figures, AMD admitted that their 3000 series CPUs were far from “best for gaming” and conceded that the 10900K is approximately 19% faster than the 3900XT (our effective speed marks the gap at just 14%). Despite this clear performance deficiency, AMD supported 3000 series sales with an aggressive and successful marketing campaign to easily outsell Intel over the last 12 months. Given the real performance uplift observed in the 5000 series, and the absence of any meaningful marketing from Intel, we expect CPU sales to shift even further in AMD’s favour. Gamers that do not wish to pay “marketing fees” should investigate Intel’s $175 USD 11400F, the $660 USD savings would be far better spent on a higher tier GPU. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback