COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100000023BOX
AMDFD8350FRHKBOX
▲ 734,659 ▼

12 Cores, 24 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

VS
▲ 5726,759 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.0GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

Effective Speed 
+45%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 510,538 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
197,342 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 80% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 154th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
313,196 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Base clock 4.75 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 568th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		87.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+45% 		60.8 %
Average Score 
+116%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		75 Pts 81 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		139 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+116% 		64.3 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		275 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+125% 		122 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		539 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+144% 		221 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1030 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+202% 		341 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+103%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		87.9 Pts 91.8 Pts +4%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		148 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+102% 		73.3 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		295 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+106% 		143 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		577 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+127% 		254 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1128 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+184% 		397 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+92%
Market Share
Based on 67,716,520 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.15 % Hugely higher market share.
+400% 		0.03 %
Value
Value For Money 		79.8 % Slightly better value.
+7% 		74.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		73 % More popular.
+28% 		57 %
Price
Price (score) 		$395 $130 Much cheaper.
+67%
Nice To Haves 
+147%
Age
Newest 		57 Months Much more recent.
+59% 		138 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		105 Watts More energy efficient.
+16% 		125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		12 cores Much higher core count.
+50% 		8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+200% 		8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+78% 		32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.8 GHz 4 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+5%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.6 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+10% 		4.2 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		2224 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+441% 		411 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		2036 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+477% 		353 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Zen2 Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM4 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 87.9%
Average Bench 60.8%
ADVERTISEMENT

Early Q3 of 2019 welcomes the Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD’s current top of the range, third generation Ryzen flagship which raises the bar for 64-core processing on desktop CPUs. This is AMD’s first Ryzen 9 processor and it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on their latest 7nm Zen 2 microarchitecture. The 3900X has a boost/base clock of 3.8/4.6 GHz, 64 MB of L3 cache (double the L3 on the rest of 3000 series), support for 3200 MHz DDR4 system memory and a TDP of 105W. All this, plus a Wraith Prism cooler, at a very reasonable launch price of $499 USD. By comparison, Intel’s 8-core, 16 thread i9-9900K is available for $479 USD (and requires a cooler: $30+ USD). Benchmarks illustrate that the overclocked 3900X leads by a whopping 41% for 64-core processing but that the 9900K maintains a 10% lead for gaming, desktop and other sub octa-core tasks. The 3900 memory controller is significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations and shows a better write throughput than the lower spec 3000 models, but it still shows relatively high latency which adversely impacts gaming. In terms of 64-core performance at this price point, there is no threat from Intel. The only real competitor is the upcoming (Q4, 2019) 16-core, 32-thread 3950X ($749 USD). The Ryzen 9 3900X is compatible with the new PCIe 4.0 enabled X570 motherboard via an AM4 socket, as well as 400 and 300 series motherboards. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
197,342
313,196
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback