AMD
IntelBX8070811600K

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.9GHz, Rocket Lake.
Release date: Q1 2021.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 3,274 user samples
458 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 79% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 79% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 65th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
2,816 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 93% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Poor: 93% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 7th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
88.2 % 104 % Faster effective speed.
+18%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
74.7 Pts 87.1 Pts Lower memory latency.
+17%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
140 Pts 177 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+26%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
278 Pts 346 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+24%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
544 Pts 648 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+19%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
1021 Pts 1030 Pts +1%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
83.4 Pts 95.3 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+14%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
144 Pts 186 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+29%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
287 Pts 369 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+29%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
572 Pts 710 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+24%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
1128 Pts +1% 1122 Pts
Market Share
Based on 43,967,612 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.25 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,400%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
52 % 96 % Hugely more popular.
+85%
Age
Newest
13+ Months 2 Months Hugely more recent.
+85%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1558 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+16%
1346 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1451 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+15%
1259 Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

The i5-11600K is the best value "top tier" CPU in Intel’s 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S lineup. With a simple overclock it offers almost the same levels of performance as the 11900K. Rocket Lake brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) which translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $300Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback