CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps 233 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
105 EFps +4% 101 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
130 EFps 131 EFps +1%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
124 EFps +4% 119 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
141 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+8%
131 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 894,561 user samples
12,353 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 96% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 79% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 0.85 GHz (avg)
Poor: 79% Great: 96%
SPEED RANK: 61st / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
882,208 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 72% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 72% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 121st / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
88.5 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+7%
83.1 %
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review
3 % FarC5 8%, BFV 3%, Rage2 1%, Civ6 13%, MetroEx 1%, Sekiro 8%, Wolf2 0% SotTR 0%, Witcher3 0%, ACO 2%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review
3 % FarC5 8%, BFV 3%, Rage2 1%, Civ6 13%, MetroEx 1%, Sekiro 8%, Wolf2 0% SotTR 0%, Witcher3 0%, ACO 2%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
8 % BFV 5%, SotTR 10%, MetroEx 5%, Divis2 10%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
78.7 Pts +1% 78.1 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
141 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+9%
129 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
280 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+11%
252 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
527 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+11%
473 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
953 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+21%
790 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
88.4 Pts +3% 86.2 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
149 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+10%
136 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
296 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+9%
272 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
571 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+7%
535 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
1052 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+20%
879 Pts
Market Share
Based on 43,894,820 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.1 % 4.45 % Insanely higher market share.
+4,350%
Value
Value For Money
79 % 89.7 % Better value.
+13%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % 93 % Much more popular.
+72%
Price
Price (score)
$420 $210 Much cheaper.
+50%
Age
Newest
11+ Months Much more recent.
+52%
23 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1584 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+41%
1127 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1479 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+43%
1032 Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

The XT series of Ryzen CPUs barely outperform their cheaper X and non-X counterparts: 3600, 3600X, 3800X, 3900X. Outside of encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU the Ryzen architecture remains limited by relatively high latency and the associated gaming bottleneck (frame drops). Dedicated hardware such as NVENC or QuickSync remains far more efficient than CPU cores for encoding. CPU based encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn. The best value CPU amongst the Ryzen range is the 3300X which is the first design to focus on delivering lower latency, and therefore better performance where users need it, rather than “Moar Coars”. Aside from the army of anonymous influencers on social media (reddit, forums, youtube etc.), users will be hard pressed to find rational arguments that favor the XT variants over their cheaper predecessors. [Jul '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-threaded processor which succeeds the Ryzen 5 2600 improving upon it by 13% in terms of overclocked performance. The 3600 is in competition with Intel’s 6-core i5-9600K. AMD continues to push the multi-core performance envelope: benchmarks show that the 3600 has a 27% overclocked 64-core lead over the 9600K but that the i5-9600K leads by 14% on single to hex core workloads which translates to 10% higher EFps in most of the today’s top games (e.g. PUBG, GTAV and CSGO). Additionally, the 3600's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which adversely impacts gaming. Weaknesses in memory architecture are not readily picked up by CPU benchmarks but they are apparent whilst gaming. Cheaper CPUs such as the 9400F deliver better gaming performance in nearly all of today’s popular games. At $190 USD, the 3600 offers good value for purely workstation tasks such as film production but streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The masterfully hyped Ryzen 3600 may well be the best CPU for multimedia producers on a tight budget but in today's market there are faster and less expensive alternatives for gamers, streamers and general desktop users. [Jun '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback