AMD100-100000071BOX
IntelBX8070110400
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps 238 EFps +2%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
105 EFps +5% 100 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
130 EFps 139 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+7%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
124 EFps 131 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+6%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
141 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+8%
131 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 707,223 user samples
635,419 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 76% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 76% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 170th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
71,804 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 69% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 69% Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 186th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
85.9 % +2% 84.5 %
22 Nov22|Gamers Nexus
Intel i7-13700K CPU Review & Bench...
16 % FarC6 15%, FinFant14 14%, GTAV 12%, SotTR 8%, CSGO 23%, R6S 14%, TWarW3 27%
28 May20|Gamers Nexus
Best CPUs of 2020 So Far (Gaming, ...
3 % Hitm2 3%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.2 Pts 86.6 Pts Lower memory latency.
+14%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
138 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+16%
119 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
270 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+16%
232 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
513 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+16%
443 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
900 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+25%
722 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
86.6 Pts 95.4 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+10%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
145 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+16%
125 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
288 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+17%
247 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
562 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+15%
488 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1009 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+30%
776 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,719,976 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.69 % Higher market share.
+13%
0.61 %
Value
Value For Money
93.4 % 104 % Better value.
+11%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
89 % +5% 85 %
Price
Price (score)
$205 $130 Much cheaper.
+37%
Age
Newest
57 Months 47 Months More recent.
+18%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts 65 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.6 GHz Faster base frequency.
+24%
2.9 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.4 GHz +2% 4.3 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1479 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+51%
979 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1358 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+49%
912 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Comet Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 FCLGA1200
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None UHD 630
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU. Out of the box, the 3700X, 3600X and 3600 achieve similar quad core speeds but the 16 threaded 3700X is 30% faster at multi-core computations than the 12 threaded 3600X. Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26% faster at 64-core computations but 13% slower for gaming and desktop (sub eight core performance). Unlike lower end Ryzen 3000 SKUs, the 3700X comes with a half decent cooler but AMD should not have bothered since a $20 aftermarket cooler is still quieter, easier to change, and better at cooling. With a Gammaxx 400 cooler we were able to maintain a 43.25x OC during our EFps tests. We had to use a fixed clock OC (rather than Offset/PBO) to avoid significant frame drops in Fortnite. With strong single-core scores, the 3700X should offer very strong gaming performance but in reality it is let down by its memory controller, which, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. The heavily hyped 3700X, paired with a 2060S, offers real world gaming performance comparable to the $80 USD entry level 4-core, 4-thread Intel Core i3-9100F. At $320 USD, the 3700X offers reasonable value to full time media encoders but general desktop users, gamers and even streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The 3700X severely bottlenecks a 2070S: gamers should investigate the 9600K, which is both cheaper and faster[Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback