AMD100-100000071BOX
AMD100-100000051WOF

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.6GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

16 Cores, 32 Threads @3.5GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q4 2019.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 685,589 user samples
635,419 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 76% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 76% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 170th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
50,170 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 79% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 79% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 139th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
85.9 % 89.3 % +4%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
1 % Hitm2 1%, FarC5 3%, TWarW2 9%, MetroEx 3%, MESoW 0% StrangeB 2%, SotTR 2%, ACO 2%, Divis2 2%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
9 % BFV 8%, SotTR 1%, MetroEx 25%, Divis2 1%
21 May20|Optimum Tech
Intel i5-10600K Review - 6-core Ga...
FarC5 1%, RDR2 1%, CSGO 9% 1 % OverW 2%, SotTR 7%, StarWJFO 7%
06 Nov20|Gamers Nexus
Friendly Fire: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X C...
7 % SotTR 9%, GTAV 5%, RDR2 7%, TWarTKC 5%, F120 10%, TWarTKB 1%, ACO 12%
28 May20|Gamers Nexus
Best CPUs of 2020 So Far (Gaming, ...
F119 1% 0 % TWarTKC 1%
07 Dec20|KitGuru
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Zen 3 CPU Review
MetroEx 2%, Divis2 3% 2 % GTAV 4%, SotTR 7%, RDR2 2%, F120 2%
05 Nov20|Anandtech
AMD Zen 3 Ryzen Deep Dive Review: ...
1 % FarC5 5%, Bord3 1%, Civ6 1%, Chernob 1%, DExMD 3%, FinFant14 1%, F119 2%, RDR2 1%, WoT 2% StrangeB 0%, GTAV 0%, FinFant15 2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.2 Pts 77.2 Pts +1%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
138 Pts 139 Pts +1%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
270 Pts 276 Pts +2%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
513 Pts 543 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+6%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
900 Pts 1074 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+19%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
86.6 Pts 88.2 Pts +2%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
145 Pts 150 Pts +3%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
288 Pts 297 Pts +3%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
562 Pts 580 Pts +3%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1009 Pts 1146 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+14%
Market Share
Based on 67,713,118 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.78 % Hugely higher market share.
+550%
0.12 %
Value
Value For Money
93.4 % Better value.
+23%
75.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
89 % Much more popular.
+48%
60 %
Price
Price (score)
$205 Much cheaper.
+59%
$506
Age
Newest
57 Months 53 Months Slightly more recent.
+7%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm 7 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.6 GHz +3% 3.5 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.4 GHz 4.7 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+7%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1479 Pts 2965 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+100%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1358 Pts 2737 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+102%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU. Out of the box, the 3700X, 3600X and 3600 achieve similar quad core speeds but the 16 threaded 3700X is 30% faster at multi-core computations than the 12 threaded 3600X. Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26% faster at 64-core computations but 13% slower for gaming and desktop (sub eight core performance). Unlike lower end Ryzen 3000 SKUs, the 3700X comes with a half decent cooler but AMD should not have bothered since a $20 aftermarket cooler is still quieter, easier to change, and better at cooling. With a Gammaxx 400 cooler we were able to maintain a 43.25x OC during our EFps tests. We had to use a fixed clock OC (rather than Offset/PBO) to avoid significant frame drops in Fortnite. With strong single-core scores, the 3700X should offer very strong gaming performance but in reality it is let down by its memory controller, which, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. The heavily hyped 3700X, paired with a 2060S, offers real world gaming performance comparable to the $80 USD entry level 4-core, 4-thread Intel Core i3-9100F. At $320 USD, the 3700X offers reasonable value to full time media encoders but general desktop users, gamers and even streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The 3700X severely bottlenecks a 2070S: gamers should investigate the 9600K, which is both cheaper and faster[Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 3950X is the 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen 3 flagship. Although this CPU offers server levels of multi-core encoding performance, there are relatively few, if any, consumer use cases for the 3950X. Streamers are better off using dedicated hardware such as NVENC which encodes far more efficiently than any CPU. Gamers are better served by low latency gaming CPUs such as the 9600K for a fraction of the price. For example, comparing these two PCs shows that the 3950X build offers less than half the gaming performance. The only rational reason to put a 3950X in a gaming build is in exchange for sponsorship money. [Feb '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback