AMD100-100000071BOX
AMDAD5700OKHJBOX

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.4GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q1 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 642,025 user samples
635,419 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 76% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 76% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 171st / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
6,606 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% Base clock 3.4 GHz
Worst Bench: 37% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 37% Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 843rd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
85.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+78%
48.3 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.2 Pts Lower memory latency.
+11%
68.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
138 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+133%
59.2 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
270 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+152%
107 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
513 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+213%
164 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
900 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+439%
167 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
86.6 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+6%
82 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
145 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+108%
69.7 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
288 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+132%
124 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
562 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+190%
194 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1009 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+420%
194 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,695,167 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.72 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
94.2 % Hugely better value.
+93%
48.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
89 % Much more popular.
+71%
52 %
Price
Price (score)
$199 Cheaper.
+25%
$265
Age
Newest
57 Months Much more recent.
+61%
147 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts 65 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+300%
4 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+78%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.6 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+6%
3.4 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.4 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+10%
4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1479 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+662%
194 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1358 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+713%
167 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 FM2
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None 7660D
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU. Out of the box, the 3700X, 3600X and 3600 achieve similar quad core speeds but the 16 threaded 3700X is 30% faster at multi-core computations than the 12 threaded 3600X. Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26% faster at 64-core computations but 13% slower for gaming and desktop (sub eight core performance). Unlike lower end Ryzen 3000 SKUs, the 3700X comes with a half decent cooler but AMD should not have bothered since a $20 aftermarket cooler is still quieter, easier to change, and better at cooling. With a Gammaxx 400 cooler we were able to maintain a 43.25x OC during our EFps tests. We had to use a fixed clock OC (rather than Offset/PBO) to avoid significant frame drops in Fortnite. With strong single-core scores, the 3700X should offer very strong gaming performance but in reality it is let down by its memory controller, which, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. The heavily hyped 3700X, paired with a 2060S, offers real world gaming performance comparable to the $80 USD entry level 4-core, 4-thread Intel Core i3-9100F. At $320 USD, the 3700X offers reasonable value to full time media encoders but general desktop users, gamers and even streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The 3700X severely bottlenecks a 2070S: gamers should investigate the 9600K, which is both cheaper and faster[Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD A10-5700 is a quad-core Trinity APU (combined CPU and GPU) based on launched in Q4 of 2012. The A10-5700 is reasonably power efficient with a TDP of 65 Watts. In terms of performance the A10-5700 scores an effective speed of 68 versus the A10-6800K’s 73. Its base clock speed is 3.4 GHz which automatically turbo boosts to 4.0 GHz when needed and is sufficient for most generic desktop applications. The integrated HD 8670 Graphics are comparable to Intel's recent HD offerings. The A10-5700 offers reasonable performance at a reasonable price point. But comparing the A10-6700 and i3-4330 shows that the comparably priced 4330 is a far more compelling alternative given its almost outright advantage on every metric. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback