AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
IntelBX80684I59400F
VS
About

6 Cores, 6 Threads @2.9GHz, Coffee Lake.
Release date: Q1 2019.

CSGO 2060S
Dust 2 1080p Max
192 EFps 220 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+15%
GTAV 2060S
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
86 EFps 94 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+9%
Overwatch 2060S
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
111 EFps 118 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+6%
PUBG 2060S
M249 Training 1080p Max
105 EFps 111 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+6%
Fortnite 2060S
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
101 EFps 122 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+21%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 258,784 user samples
218,680 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 86% Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 73% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 73% Great: 86%
SPEED RANK: 58th / 1202
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
40,104 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 86% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 76% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 76% Great: 86%
SPEED RANK: 52nd / 1202
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
81.7 % 82.5 % +1%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
119 Pts 120 Pts +1%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
234 Pts 238 Pts +2%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
460 Pts 465 Pts +1%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
847 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+28%
662 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
126 Pts 126 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
249 Pts +0% 248 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
490 Pts +0% 488 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
949 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+33%
714 Pts
Market Share
Based on 22,380,599 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.33 % Hugely higher market share.
+120%
1.06 %
Value
Value For Money
87.5 % 98.7 % Slightly better value.
+13%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
120 % 184 % Much more popular.
+53%
Price
Price (score)
$216 $145 Much cheaper.
+33%
Age
Newest
19 Months 10 Months Much more recent.
+47%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+167%
6 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm Slightly newer manufacturing.
+14%
14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+28%
2.9 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz +5% 4.1 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1370 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+91%
717 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1283 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+91%
670 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Coffee Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 FCLGA1151
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by about 10%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Intel’s Core i5-9400F is a hex-core 9th generation Coffee Lake desktop processor. It features base / boost clocks of 2.9 / 4.1 GHz, 9 MB of cache, a 65W TDP and it ships with a cooler but it does not have integrated graphics like the “non-F” variants. Although the 9400F is compatible with the enthusiast grade Z390 chipset it is normally paired with a better value for money B360 motherboard. At its launch the i5-9400F retailed for $180 but prices have dropped to the point ($135) that it now represents an excellent value proposition to gamers. Comparing the i5-9400F to the Ryzen 3600 shows that the 3600 is 8% better for quad-core processing but it costs 40% ($50) more than the 9400F. Ordinarily higher quad-core performance would result in better gaming but the Ryzen 3000 memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. Gamers can invest the $50 savings in a better GPU, for example by upgrading from an AMD RX 570 to an RX 580. Since the GPU makes the most difference to gaming, the end result is a system which offers far superior real world gaming performance for similar money. For those gamers who demand the best of the best, it is necessary to jump to one of the higher frequency SKUs such as the 9600K but for everyone else the i5-9400F offers unparalleled value. [Aug '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical gamers and desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback