AMDYD2700BBAFBOX
IntelBX8070811600K

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.2GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.9GHz, Rocket Lake.
Release date: Q1 2021.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
198 EFps 296 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+49%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
96 EFps 108 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+12%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
135 EFps 142 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+5%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
113 EFps 143 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+27%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
115 EFps 134 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+17%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 167,786 user samples
123,820 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 83% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 64% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Poor: 64% Great: 83%
SPEED RANK: 325th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
43,966 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 91% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 91% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 76th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
73.8 % 99.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+35%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
75.7 Pts 88.4 Pts Lower memory latency.
+17%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
103 Pts 162 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+57%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
202 Pts 313 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+55%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
387 Pts 592 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+53%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
667 Pts 945 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+42%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
83.7 Pts 95.4 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+14%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
118 Pts 172 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+46%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
236 Pts 338 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+43%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
453 Pts 661 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+46%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
823 Pts 1034 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+26%
Market Share
Based on 67,752,588 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.11 % 0.3 % Hugely higher market share.
+173%
Value
Value For Money
82.6 % 112 % Much better value.
+36%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
63 % 90 % Much more popular.
+43%
Price
Price (score)
$185 $180 +3%
Age
Newest
72 Months 36 Months Much more recent.
+50%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+48%
125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm Newer manufacturing.
+14%
14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.2 GHz 3.9 GHz Faster base frequency.
+22%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.1 GHz 4.9 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+20%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1176 Pts 1256 Pts Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.
+7%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1017 Pts 1165 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+15%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Rocket Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 FCLGA1200
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None UHD 750
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ryzen 7 2700 is an 8 core, 16 thread high-end desktop processor featuring AMD’s second generation 12nm Zen+ architecture and Precision Boost 2 technology. It is the second strongest of four new Ryzen CPUs due for imminent release. The second generation Ryzen processors, codenamed Pinnacle Ridge, are both compatible with the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Official specs for the 2700 are yet to be seen, but early benchmarks appear to indicate base and boost clock speeds of 3.2 and 4.1 GHz respectively. This translates to a modest improvement upon the previous generation 1700 which continues to offer fantastic value for money in terms of multi-core performance. The expected retail price of $299 includes a Wraith cooler and costs the same as Intel’s 6 core 12 thread i7-8700. As expected, the 8700 beats the 2700 on single and quad core intensive tasks, but lags slightly for higher core workloads. Even though the 2700 excels at pure multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames.  [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The i5-11600K is the best value "top tier" CPU in Intel’s 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S lineup. With a simple overclock it offers almost the same levels of performance as the 11900K. Rocket Lake brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) which translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback