COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMDYD1700BBAEBOX
AMDAD750KWOHJBOX
▲ 6913,312 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.0GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q1 2017.

VS
▲ 542,331 ▼

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.4GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

Effective Speed 
+35%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 150,357 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
144,475 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 422nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
5,882 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 59% Base clock 4.1 GHz
Worst Bench: 40% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 40% Great: 59%
SPEED RANK: 765th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		69 % Much faster effective speed.
+35% 		51.1 %
Average Score 
+101%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		70 Pts 72.7 Pts +4%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		96.7 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+59% 		60.9 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		190 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+73% 		110 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		366 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+113% 		172 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		640 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+266% 		175 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+102%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		78.8 Pts 84.5 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		116 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+61% 		72.2 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		233 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+75% 		133 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		456 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+110% 		217 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		798 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+269% 		216 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+∞%
Market Share
Based on 67,711,361 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.09 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞% 		0 %
Value
Value For Money 		76.1 % 84.2 % Better value.
+11%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		69 % More popular.
+28% 		54 %
Price
Price (score) 		$195 $45 Much cheaper.
+77%
Nice To Haves 
+157%
Age
Newest 		85 Months Much more recent.
+38% 		137 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+35% 		100 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100% 		4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+300% 		4 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+56% 		32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3 GHz 3.4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+13%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		3.7 GHz 4 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+8%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1178 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+445% 		216 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		980 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+460% 		175 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Zen Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM4 FM2
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 69%
Average Bench 51.1%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is the least powerful of three new Ryzen 7 CPUs. The 1700 model has base and turbo clocks of 3.0 and 3.7 GHz respectively. Both of its more expensive siblings, the 1700X and 1800X, have higher clocks but they also have TDPs of 95 watts whereas the 1700 is rated at just 65 watts. Comparing IPC between Ryzen and Kaby Lake shows that Kaby Lake leads by a maximum of 9% which is great news for workstation users as this allows the 1700 to beat Intel's 6850K in multi-core workloads at almost half the price. Although the 1700 has great IPC it's somewhat limited by its relatively low (by Kaby Lake standards) clock speed which holds it back a little in both gaming and desktop workloads. For multi-core workstation use, the Ryzen 7 1700 represents the best value for money we have ever seen. [Mar '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Athlon II X4 750K is not about outright speed, it's about value for money. As a result of its relatively weak single core performance, which is around 26% slower than the 3225, the 750K scores in the bottom 34% for real world consumer performance. The Intel competitors offer far snappier response times but only if you are prepared to pay around 70% more. If you are on a super tight budget the 750K may well be the best option but for most consumer orientated tasks it's probably worth paying a little more. [Jun '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
144,475
5,882
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback