COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100000593WOF
IntelBX8070811400F
▲ 804,162 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @4.7GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

VS
About
▲ 897,854 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @2.6GHz, Rocket Lake.
Release date: Q1 2021.

Effective Speed 
+17%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 39,264 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
803 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 119% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 100% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 100% Great: 119%
SPEED RANK: 29th / 1404
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
38,461 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 87% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Poor: 87% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 91st / 1404
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		110 % Faster effective speed.
+17% 		94.1 %
Average Score 
+29%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		82.2 Pts 86.7 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+5%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		204 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+39% 		147 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		397 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+38% 		287 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		737 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+35% 		545 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1153 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+36% 		847 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+31%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		92.3 Pts 95 Pts +3%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		214 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+40% 		153 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		429 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+42% 		302 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		811 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+38% 		588 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1240 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+37% 		906 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+199%
Market Share
Based on 60,337,763 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.09 % 0.76 % Hugely higher market share.
+744%
Value
Value For Money 		117 % +1% 116 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		80 % 89 % More popular.
+11%
Price
Price (score) 		$220 $128 Much cheaper.
+42%
Nice To Haves 
+30%
Age
Newest 		6 Months Much more recent.
+75% 		24 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		105 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		6 cores 6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		12 threads 12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		5 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+64% 		14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		4.7 GHz Hugely faster base frequency.
+81% 		2.6 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		5.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+20% 		4.4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1487 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+34% 		1112 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1396 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+34% 		1042 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Zen4 Rocket Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM5 FCLGA1200
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		RDNA2 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 110%
Average Bench 94.1%
ADVERTISEMENT

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Rocket Lake i5-11400F paired with a B560 motherboard and 3200 RAM ($365 USD) offers unprecedented value for money to gamers. It completely prices AMD's 5000 series out of the market. Rocket Lake brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) which translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
803
38,461
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2023 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $315Nvidia RTX 3060 $350Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $194Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $150Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback