CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps 259 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+11%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
105 EFps 106 EFps +1%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
130 EFps 142 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+9%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
124 EFps 134 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+8%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
141 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+8%
131 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 27,232 user samples
24,723 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 75% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 75% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 86th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
2,509 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 86% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 86% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 26th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
86 % 97.8 % Faster effective speed.
+14%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
78.9 Pts 84.6 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
138 Pts 159 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+15%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
271 Pts 314 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+16%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
500 Pts 595 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+19%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
829 Pts 935 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+13%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.7 Pts 94.1 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
147 Pts 166 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+13%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
291 Pts 331 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+14%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
560 Pts 646 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+15%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
905 Pts 1017 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+12%
Market Share
Based on 44,119,987 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.17 % 0.18 % Slightly higher market share.
+6%
Value
Value For Money
84.2 % 104 % Better value.
+24%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
56 % 98 % Much more popular.
+75%
Price
Price (score)
$300 $220 Cheaper.
+27%
Age
Newest
11+ Months 3 Months Much more recent.
+73%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1172 Pts 1187 Pts +1%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1078 Pts 1135 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+5%
ADVERTISEMENT

The XT series of Ryzen CPUs barely outperform their cheaper X and non-X counterparts: 3600, 3600X, 3800X, 3900X. Outside of encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU the Ryzen architecture remains limited by relatively high latency and the associated gaming bottleneck (frame drops). Dedicated hardware such as NVENC or QuickSync remains far more efficient than CPU cores for encoding. CPU based encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn. The best value CPU amongst the Ryzen range is the 3300X which is the first design to focus on delivering lower latency, and therefore better performance where users need it, rather than “Moar Coars”. Aside from the army of anonymous influencers on social media (reddit, forums, youtube etc.), users will be hard pressed to find rational arguments that favor the XT variants over their cheaper predecessors. [Jul '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Rocket Lake i5-11400F paired with a B560 motherboard and 3200 RAM ($365 USD) offers unprecedented value for money to gamers. It completely prices AMD's 5000 series out of the market. Rocket Lake brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) which translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback