AMDYD2600BBAFBOX
IntelBX80684I59600K

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.7GHz, Coffee Lake.
Release date: Q4 2018.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
198 EFps 280 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+41%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
96 EFps 110 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+15%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
135 EFps 138 EFps +2%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
113 EFps 135 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+19%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
115 EFps 133 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+16%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 500,782 user samples
179,588 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 67% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 67% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 331st / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
321,194 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 103% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 82% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 82% Great: 103%
SPEED RANK: 120th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
73.3 % 93.2 % Faster effective speed.
+27%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
StrangeB 0% 17 % Hitm2 25%, FarC5 31%, TWarW2 24%, SotTR 28%, ACO 8%, MetroEx 16%, MESoW 12%, Divis2 9%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ...
Rage2 4% 16 % FarC5 36%, BFV 18%, SotTR 1%, Witcher3 5%, Civ6 26%, ACO 2%, MetroEx 16%, Sekiro 38%, Wolf2 19%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
22 % Hitm2 18%, TWarW2 18%, GTAV 30%, SotTR 24%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.6 Pts 91 Pts Lower memory latency.
+19%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
108 Pts 135 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+25%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
210 Pts 268 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+28%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
377 Pts 525 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+39%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
621 Pts 688 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+11%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
83.8 Pts 96.5 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+15%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
118 Pts 153 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+30%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
232 Pts 306 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+32%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
446 Pts 604 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+35%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
676 Pts 822 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+22%
Market Share
Based on 67,720,749 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.43 % 0.97 % Hugely higher market share.
+126%
Value
Value For Money
91.3 % 109 % Better value.
+20%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
76 % 92 % More popular.
+21%
Price
Price (score)
$125 Cheaper.
+19%
$155
Age
Newest
72 Months 66 Months Slightly more recent.
+8%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+32%
95 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
6 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm Newer manufacturing.
+14%
14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.4 GHz 3.7 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+9%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.9 GHz 4.6 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+18%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
889 Pts +5% 848 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
800 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+12%
717 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Coffee Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 FCLGA1151
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None UHD 630
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ryzen 5 2600, from AMD’s second generation (Zen+) of high-end desktop Ryzen processors, supersedes the first generation Ryzen 5 1600. The newer generation sees a lithography reduction from 14nm to 12nm, but no increase in the number of cores and threads (6 and 12 respectively) over the ground-breaking first generation which continues to surpass similarly priced Intel CPUs in terms of multi-core performance. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The 2600 appears to have a stock base/boost clock of 3.4 / 3.9 GHz compared to the 1600’s 3.2 / 3.6 GHz which is expected to result in a modest increase in effective speed that said, early benchmarks are inconclusive. Included in the expected retail price of about $200 is a Wraith Stealth cooler, so the 2600, like the 1600 before it, represents great value for workstation users. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. Even though the 2600 is plausible for multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The hex-core i5-9600K is third in Intel’s line-up of 9th generation Coffee Lake CPUs. It has a TDP of 95W and requires an aftermarket cooler (such as the $20 GAMMAXX 400). The 9600K was designed to be overclocked. Once this is enabled in the BIOS (requires a Z-series motherboard), the 9600K runs 10% faster. In terms of performance, the i5-9600K is almost unbeatable for desktop users and it has sufficient multi-core performance to handle all but the most demanding workstation tasks. For CPU encoding (Cinebench, Blender, Handbrake etc.) the Ryzen 3000 series offers great 64-core performance. For example the overclocked Ryzen 3600 is approximately 13% worse for gaming, desktop and normal consumer workloads but it is 27% faster for 64-core processing. CPU encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn, encoding tasks are far better performed by dedicated hardware such an NVENC or QuickSync. At stock clocks the i5-9600K is around 8% slower than Intel’s flagship i9-9900K but when both are overclocked, the 9600K closes the gaming gap to within two or three percent. Considering that the 9900K is the fastest gaming processor available, and almost twice the price of the 9600K, this is no small feat. The i5-9600K is aimed squarely at gamers who are not willing to compromise on performance but don't want to pay more than they need to. [Oct '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback