Real World Speed
Performance profile from 162,370 user samples
127,822 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 77% Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 77%
SPEED RANK: 370th / 1314
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
34,548 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 75% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 49% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Poor: 49% Great: 75%
SPEED RANK: 379th / 1314
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
67.4 % +1% 67.1 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
69.2 Pts +1% 68.8 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
94.1 Pts 102 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+8%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
187 Pts 201 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+7%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
378 Pts +1% 376 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
384 Pts +1% 381 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
81.1 Pts +5% 77.4 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
111 Pts 112 Pts +1%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
222 Pts 223 Pts +0%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
435 Pts +0% 433 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
438 Pts +0% 437 Pts
Market Share
Based on 42,961,978 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.38 % Hugely higher market share.
+443%
0.07 %
Value
Value For Money
88.3 % Much better value.
+35%
65.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
65 % Slightly more popular.
+7%
61 %
Price
Price (score)
$104 Much cheaper.
+65%
$300
Age
Newest
39+ Months More recent.
+13%
45 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
437 Pts 438 Pts +0%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
384 Pts 384 Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s Ryzen 3 2200G is a budget APU (accelerated processing unit: combined CPU and GPU) from its Raven Ridge product line. It has 4 Zen CPU cores which run at a base clock of 3.5 GHz up to a max boost clock of 3.7 GHz. It also has Radeon Vega 8 Graphics. The $105 price tag also includes a Wraith Stealth cooler. Intel’s 15% more expensive quad core i3-8100 CPU beats the 2200G in terms of single core workloads by 13%, but the effective speed of Intel’s integrated UHD 630 Graphics falls around 77% short of AMD’s RX Vega 8. The 2200G offers unsurpassed value for money for an all in one budget multimedia or ultra budget gaming PC. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

At a list price of just $129, the quad core, Ryzen 3 1300X is a great budget CPU. The Ryzen 3 series is based on AMD's powerful and energy efficient Zen core architecture as already featured in the mainstream Ryzen 5 series and performance Ryzen 7 series, both launched earlier this year. The 1300X is fully unlocked with a stock base clock speed of 3.5 GHz running up to 3.7 GHz for boost and has a TDP of 65W. The 1300X comes with AMD's Wraith Stealth cooler, but significantly, it is devoid of integrated graphics. Although this can be inexpensively rectified, it may be a stumbling block to those at the entry-level of the market. By comparison, Intel's dual core, four thread i3-7350K comes with 630 HD integrated graphics. In terms of effective speed, early benchmarks for the 1300X just pip the 7350K to the post but results in specific games will depend on the extent to which the game is able to use more than two processing cores simultaneously. The 1300X scores around 20% higher on quad-core tests whereas the 7350K scores 16% higher on single-core tests. The Ryzen 1300X has been released alongside the similar Ryzen 3 1200 which is also an unlocked quad-core with slightly lower base / boost clock speeds of 3.1 / 3.4 GHz and a slightly lower price of just $109. [Jul '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $196Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $50
Intel Core i5-11600K $255Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $385Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $102SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback