AMDFD9590FHHKWOF
IntelBX8070811400

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.7GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2013.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @2.6GHz, Rocket Lake.
Release date: Q1 2021.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 31,343 user samples
26,106 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Base clock 5.1 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 57% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 57% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 364th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
5,237 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 82% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 82% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
68 % 97.4 % Much faster effective speed.
+43%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
82.9 Pts 84.5 Pts +2%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
79.8 Pts 159 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+99%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
153 Pts 313 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+105%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
287 Pts 593 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+107%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
498 Pts 917 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+84%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92.8 Pts 94.5 Pts +2%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
89.1 Pts 166 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+86%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
176 Pts 331 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+88%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
334 Pts 647 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+94%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
578 Pts 1017 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+76%
Market Share
Based on 46,563,090 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.03 % 0.21 % Hugely higher market share.
+600%
Value
Value For Money
79.8 % 97.8 % Better value.
+23%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
56 % 88 % Much more popular.
+57%
Price
Price (score)
$155 Much cheaper.
+43%
$273
Age
Newest
98 Months 5 Months Hugely more recent.
+95%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
220 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+70%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
8 threads 12 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
32 nm 14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+56%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
4.7 GHz Hugely faster base frequency.
+81%
2.6 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+14%
4.4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
577 Pts 1186 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+106%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
504 Pts 1106 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+119%
Series
CPU Architecture
Piledriver Rocket Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM3+ FCLGA1200
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None UHD 730
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD released the FX-9590 back in July 2013 but it's not until recently that these processors have started hitting the shelves and even now prices are still extremely high. This is the first mainstream 5GHz processor but clock speed isn't the key performance indicator it once was. Comparing the 9590 to the 8350 shows that the 9590 has 16% better overall performance which is almost exactly in line with its base clock increase from 4.0 to 4.7 GHz. Despite this performance boost the 9590 still lags Intel's most recent 4770K Haswell processor by 26% and that's despite the AMD's 27% higher base clock. In terms of relative performance the AMD's strong point is Integer processing where it has 8 processing units vs just four (one per core) in the 4770K. Overall, especially at current prices, the 9590 doesn't represent good value for money. [Jan '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback