Real World Speed
Performance profile from 107,852 user samples
23,449 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Base clock 4.7 GHz
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 301st / 1258
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
84,403 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 315th / 1258
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
69.2 % +1% 68.5 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
84.9 Pts Lower memory latency.
+14%
74.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
80.7 Pts 104 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+29%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
155 Pts 192 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+24%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
290 Pts 338 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+17%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
504 Pts 585 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+16%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
94.1 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+13%
83.5 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
88.9 Pts 115 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+29%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
176 Pts 227 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+29%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
333 Pts 420 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+26%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
581 Pts 644 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+11%
Market Share
Based on 31,655,982 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.06 % 0.42 % Hugely higher market share.
+600%
Value
Value For Money
74.2 % 81.3 % Slightly better value.
+10%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
68 % 98 % Much more popular.
+44%
Price
Price (score)
$216 $149 Much cheaper.
+31%
Age
Newest
85 Months 30+ Months Much more recent.
+65%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
583 Pts 642 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+10%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
508 Pts 586 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+15%
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD released the FX-9590 back in July 2013 but it's not until recently that these processors have started hitting the shelves and even now prices are still extremely high. This is the first mainstream 5GHz processor but clock speed isn't the key performance indicator it once was. Comparing the 9590 to the 8350 shows that the 9590 has 16% better overall performance which is almost exactly in line with its base clock increase from 4.0 to 4.7 GHz. Despite this performance boost the 9590 still lags Intel's most recent 4770K Haswell processor by 26% and that's despite the AMD's 27% higher base clock. In terms of relative performance the AMD's strong point is Integer processing where it has 8 processing units vs just four (one per core) in the 4770K. Overall, especially at current prices, the 9590 doesn't represent good value for money. [Jan '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The budget Ryzen 5 2400G is a four core, eight thread APU (accelerated processing unit: combined CPU and GPU) from AMD’s Raven Ridge product line. It has a base clock of 3.6 GHz which boosts to 3.9 GHz. Its RX Vega 11 graphics scores an average bench of 20% which is at the forefront of performance from integrated graphics and is 34% faster than the RX Vega 8 graphics found in the Ryzen 3 2200G (the 2400G’s ultra budget sister APU). The 2400G currently retails at $162 and includes a Wraith Stealth cooler. This puts it in direct competition with Intel’s quad core Coffee Lake i3-8350K at $167, which does have a 26% faster effective speed. However, the 2400G’s integrated graphics are far stronger (137%) than the 8350K’s, making the 2400G a great choice for those looking for an economical multimedia PC or a super budget gaming PC. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2020 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $315Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback