COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMDFD8350FRHKBOX
AMDFD6300WMHKBOX
▲ 5726,763 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.0GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

VS
▲ 5717,200 ▼

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.5GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

Effective Speed 
+10%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 574,803 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
313,196 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Base clock 4.75 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 568th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
261,607 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 44% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 44% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 676th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		60.8 % Faster effective speed.
+10% 		55.2 %
Average Score 
+23%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		81 Pts +2% 79.2 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		64.3 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+13% 		56.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		122 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+17% 		104 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		221 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+26% 		176 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		341 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+57% 		217 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+19%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		91.8 Pts +3% 89 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		73.3 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+7% 		68.5 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		143 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+15% 		124 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		254 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+18% 		215 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		397 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+50% 		265 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+71%
Market Share
Based on 67,749,161 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.03 % 0.09 % Hugely higher market share.
+200%
Value
Value For Money 		74.9 % 89.9 % Better value.
+20%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		57 % 57 %
Price
Price (score) 		$130 $47 Much cheaper.
+64%
Nice To Haves 
+18%
Age
Newest 		138 Months 138 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		125 Watts 95 Watts More energy efficient.
+24%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		8 cores Much higher core count.
+33% 		6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		8 threads Much higher thread count.
+33% 		6 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		32 nm 32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+14% 		3.5 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.2 GHz +2% 4.1 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		411 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+49% 		275 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		353 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+56% 		226 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Piledriver Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM3+ AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 60.8%
Average Bench 55.2%
ADVERTISEMENT

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX 6-Core, like most CPUs from AMD, delivers reasonably good server orientated multi threaded performance and consequently good processing thoughput at a reasonable price tag. Where the FX 6-Core lacks is in the area of single core performance which although not normally a major problem for server workloads, is always very relevant to desktop users. The overall performance of the FX 6-Core is comparable to Intel's five years younger Core i7-950. There are server orientated use cases where the FX 6-Core will excel thanks to its excellent overall throughput and in those instances the FX 6-Core represents good value for money. But typical desktop users will find far better value elsewhere. [Sep '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
313,196
261,607
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback