MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 49% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Micro-Star GL62M 7REX
Motherboard	MSI MS-16J9 (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170711
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '18 at 21:01
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	10%
CPU Throttled	49%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Memory 58.3 1-Core 42.6 2-Core 67.3 37% 56.1 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 204 22% 174 Pts	64-Core 227 14% 227 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 11C8) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.5% Poor	Lighting 33.2 Reflection 28.7 Parallax 24.3 27% 28.7 fps	MRender 28.3 Gravity 28.3 Splatting 34.9 25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB 11,069 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 128 128 126 125 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 1,361 Write 702 Mixed 516 SusWrite 139 149% 679 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 32.2 124% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 474 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 278 220% 314 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 234%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 231GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 92 93 92 93 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 80.7 Write 87.6 Mixed 56.8 SusWrite 91.6 58% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 138% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB 122,420 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	37.8% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 10.8 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 11.2 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2,441x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	1,287x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2,223x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,007x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	497x

SSD
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples	205x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 11,069 samples	126x
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples	110x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	757x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	301x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	211x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16