PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock A88M-G/3.1 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160505 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 22 '18 at 08:09 |
Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.1%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.5.1
|
21.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 192 182 172 159 157 MB/s
|
75.5%
Very good
|
|||
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
306GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
||||
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 4GB
0GB free, PID 070e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 MB/s
|
1.77%
Terrible
|
|||
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 2GB
2GB free, PID 070e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 8.9 9.6 10 9.1 9.4 MB/s
|
7.41%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata DDR3 2400 2OZ 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
45.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples | 18x |
A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $889Bench 47%, 6,638 samples | 13x |
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 19x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 6x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $175 |