Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	24% Poor	Memory 41.4 1-Core 23.6 2-Core 45.3 24% 36.8 Pts	4-Core 38.9 8-Core 44.3 5% 41.6 Pts	64-Core 33.7 2% 33.7 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 8205) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.36% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 1.81 Parallax 2.31 1% 1.86 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 2.35 2% 2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.36% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 54 56 64 50 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 340 Write 353 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 106 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 12.8 4K Mixed 15.2 61% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 82.5 DQ Mixed 44.9 47% 77.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB 64,960 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 4.3 14% 4.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 196 20% 196 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,491x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,735x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,180x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	399x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	377x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	341x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16