Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 838F
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180226
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '18 at 01:21
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 94 1-Core 120 2-Core 225 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 566 63% 497 Pts	64-Core 590 36% 590 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 838F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4944 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.44% Terrible	Lighting 7.8 Reflection 11 Parallax 7.88 6% 8.89 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 7 Splatting 15.4 10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.44% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% HP(103C 838F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Lighting 42.4 Reflection 33.2 Parallax 40.6 35% 38.8 fps	MRender 43.1 Gravity 42.7 Splatting 38.7 34% 41.5 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA1-8D128-HP 128GB 4,097 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: A182 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 142 133 132 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 1,231 Write 543 Mixed 309 SusWrite 151 122% 558 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 92.5 4K Mixed 60.2 186% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 543 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 365 295% 420 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 337%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 268GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 455 465 465 433 291 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 429 Mixed 418 SusWrite 429 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 83.6 4K Mixed 46.4 156% 54.8 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 351 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB 9,568 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80.6% Excellent	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 23 81% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 25.4 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,347x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	785x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	777x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	293x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	272x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	158x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	350x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	308x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	191x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16