| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock AB350M (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170306 |
| Uptime | 22.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 12 '18 at 01:19 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | GUM-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.8%
Good
|
63% 110 Pts
|
46% 374 Pts
|
29% 471 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.1%
Average
|
39% 49 fps
|
46% 56.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 500GB-$84
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 229 74 111 134 105 MB/s
|
75.5%
Very good
|
65% 292 MB/s
|
116% 41.8 MB/s
|
186% 271 MB/s
|
|
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 124 122 127 126 121 MB/s
|
52.7%
Above average
|
64% 87.4 MB/s
|
220% 1.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB-$30
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
64.5%
Good
|
67% 23.5 GB/s
|
52% 18.4 GB/s
|
36% 110 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical AB350M Builds (Compare 373 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock AB350M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 77x |
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 47x |
| Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples | 40x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 55x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 46x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 43x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 103% - Outstanding | Total price: $298 |