Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateJul 11 '18 at 15:50
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 63
1-Core 106
2-Core 214
69% 127 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 683
67% 548 Pts
64-Core 1,121
69% 1,121 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
XFX(1682 2980) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
8.74% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 9.15
Parallax 9.56
9% 10 fps
MRender 8.57
Gravity 8.23
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.12 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.74%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,809
Write 1,120
Mixed 481
249% 1,136 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 41.9
159% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 736
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 570
441% 607 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
44GB free
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 137 138 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 347
Mixed 287
SusWrite 170
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 46.7
162% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 146
157% 260 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 190 193 191 191 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 144
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 190
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
30GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 103 104 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 140
Write 1.2
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 102
90% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2
115% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.5% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 11
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.1
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $738
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback