Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-E  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150618
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 10 '18 at 12:23
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 169
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 281
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 40.4
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 38.4
33% 36.7 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 36.4
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 54GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14% Very poor
Read 71.3
Write 37.5
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 13.6
10% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 9.9
32% 9.63 MB/s
DQ Read 8
DQ Write 7.8
DQ Mixed 8.6
6% 8.13 MB/s
Ccboot iSCSI 1TB
48GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.56% Terrible
Read 12.3
Write 15
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 13.7
3% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 8.5
25% 7.93 MB/s
DQ Read 5.8
DQ Write 7.3
DQ Mixed 6.9
5% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.56%
Great: 103%
Ccboot iSCSI 960GB
255GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.2% Very poor
Read 48.8
Write 29.2
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 13.7
7% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 8.3
26% 8.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1.8
DQ Write 2.5
DQ Mixed 1.1
1% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $548
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback