Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42 8,502 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Memory 72.3 1-Core 33.6 2-Core 52.3 38% 52.7 Pts	4-Core 56.2 8-Core 59.7 8% 58 Pts	64-Core 67 4% 67 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9300M GS 2,044 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 19B2) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 320.49 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.49% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.38 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.72 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.43 1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.49% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505CUA SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 88 51 69 75 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 135 Write 177 Mixed 187 SusWrite 71.9 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 49.5 4K Mixed 22.7 88% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 23.5 DQ Write 61 DQ Mixed 27.9 25% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 5 16% 5.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5 15% 5.17 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core2 Duo T5800IntelBench 34%, 3,175 samples	1x
Core2 Duo T6400Intel $99Bench 34%, 4,995 samples	1x
Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9300M GSNvidiaBench 1%, 2,044 samples	4x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16